The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781003075028-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a framework for responsible innovation*

Abstract: The governance of emerging science and innovation is a major challenge for contemporary democracies. In this paper we present a framework for understanding and supporting efforts aimed at 'responsible innovation'. The framework was developed in part through work with one of the first major research projects in the controversial area of geoengineering, funded by the UK Research Councils. We describe this case study, and how this became a location to articulate and explore four integrated dimensions of responsib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
703
0
23

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(731 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(130 reference statements)
5
703
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Responsible research and innovation (RRI) has become a popular topic within and beyond STS of late, with scholars engaging in debates over new technologies, such as nanotechnology, emphasizing the need for modes of research and innovation that anticipate and take account, at an early stage, of social, ethical and political challenges and questions; which involve deliberation among and responsiveness to diverse experts and stakeholders; and which are accountable to concerned publics (e.g. [6,54]). We summarize which lessons can be learned from experiments in applying an RRI framework to climate engineering for the future work of the IPCC.…”
Section: From Neutral To Responsible Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responsible research and innovation (RRI) has become a popular topic within and beyond STS of late, with scholars engaging in debates over new technologies, such as nanotechnology, emphasizing the need for modes of research and innovation that anticipate and take account, at an early stage, of social, ethical and political challenges and questions; which involve deliberation among and responsiveness to diverse experts and stakeholders; and which are accountable to concerned publics (e.g. [6,54]). We summarize which lessons can be learned from experiments in applying an RRI framework to climate engineering for the future work of the IPCC.…”
Section: From Neutral To Responsible Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regard to technological innovation, these values are reflected in the notion of “responsible innovation” which is a transparent and iterative process by which social actors and innovators become mutually responsible to each other, building upon common values to ensure ethical acceptability and societal desirability of the innovation process . An example is the creation of “T‐City Friedrichshafen” which was initiated as a public‐private‐partnership (PPP) between Deutsche Telekom AG and the city of Friedrichshafen to use modern technology to transform Friedrichshafen into a “smart city.”…”
Section: Need For a New Workplace Safety And Health Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RRI has four dimensions, namely, anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion and responsiveness [42]. We will consider in turn how these might play out a role in industrial biotechnology.…”
Section: Responsible Research and Innovation For Industrial Biotechnomentioning
confidence: 99%