1984
DOI: 10.1029/jd089id07p11749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deuterium and oxygen 18 in precipitation: Modeling of the isotopic effects during snow formation

Abstract: The classical Rayleigh model assuming isotopic equilibrium fails to explain the deuterium and oxygen 18 contents of polar snow. This model leads to too high temperature‐isotope gradients (both for δD and δ18O), to too low δD ‐ δ18O slopes, and consequently to an excessively large range of deuterium excess values (d = δD ‐ 8δ18O). We present a new model that takes into account the existence of an isotopic kinetic effect at snow formation as a result of the fact that vapor deposition occurs in an environment sup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
778
1
9

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 766 publications
(814 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
26
778
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is run assuming a constant relationship between condensation and surface temperature [49]. The order of magnitude of the N 18 O sw correction has the same amplitude as the glacialî nterglacial deuterium excess signal (an LGM correction of +2.7x to compare with a glacial deuterium excess decrease of 4x) but only a weak impact on the deuterium (an LGM correction of 35x compared to a glacial deuterium decrease of 45x).…”
Section: Methodology Of Site and Source Temperature Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is run assuming a constant relationship between condensation and surface temperature [49]. The order of magnitude of the N 18 O sw correction has the same amplitude as the glacialî nterglacial deuterium excess signal (an LGM correction of +2.7x to compare with a glacial deuterium excess decrease of 4x) but only a weak impact on the deuterium (an LGM correction of 35x compared to a glacial deuterium decrease of 45x).…”
Section: Methodology Of Site and Source Temperature Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaporation and condensation leave a fingerprint in the isotopologue ratios due to differences in vapor pressure and kinetic diffusion properties of the isotopologues (Dansgaard, 1964;Merlivat, 1978;Jouzel and Merlivat, 1984). This fingerprint is mainly depending on temperature (vapor pressure), but it also contains information of relative humidity (kinetic effect) during evaporation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] To account for the presence of cloud within an adiabatic plume, the Rayleigh model may be modified so that conversion of condensate to precipitation is less than 100% [Dansgaard, 1964;Jouzel and Merlivat, 1984;Noone, 2012]. By defining a precipitation efficiency parameter ε, which varies from 0 if all condensate is held with the ascending vapor to 1 if all condensate is converted to precipitation, the isotope ratio of the vapor (R) can be written for discrete vertical points in the profile as…”
Section: Isotopic Models For the Convective Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%