2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4996995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detonation propagation in annular arcs of condensed phase explosives

Abstract: We present a numerical study of detonation propagation in unconfined explosive charges shaped as an annular arc (rib). Steady detonation in a straight charge propagates at constant speed but when it enters an annular section, it goes through a transition phase and eventually reaches a new steady state of constant angular velocity. This study examines the speed of the detonation wave along the annular charge during the transition phase and at steady state, as well as its dependence on the dimensions of the annu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows the r 0 = 20 mm confined and unconfined test for reference. The tests also show good qualitative agreement with previous numerical rate stick tests, such as Ioannou et al [19], the strong confinement case of Banks et al [2] and Michael and Nikiforakis [25].…”
Section: Rate Stick Testssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2 shows the r 0 = 20 mm confined and unconfined test for reference. The tests also show good qualitative agreement with previous numerical rate stick tests, such as Ioannou et al [19], the strong confinement case of Banks et al [2] and Michael and Nikiforakis [25].…”
Section: Rate Stick Testssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results are non-dimensionalised following the procedure in Ioannou et al [19]. Here, quantities are nondimensionalised using the CJ (Chapman-Jouguet) detonation velocity, D CJ , for LX-17 and a reference time:…”
Section: Rate Stick Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contrasts the mixed approach used by both Schoch et al [33] and Michael and Nikiforakis [23] Figure 2 shows the results of several confined and unconfined rate stick tests with comparison against experiment [34]. The results are non-dimensionalised following the procedure in Ioannou et al [17]. The results show good agreement with the experimental values, validating the reactive part of the model.…”
Section: Confined Rate Stick Testmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The explosive's products and reactants are governed by the JWL equation-of-state previously outlined. The reactants have the parameters A = 7.781×10 13 Pa, B = −5.031×10 9 Pa, R 1 = 11.3, R 2 = 1.13, Γ = 0.8938, C V = 1305.5 Jkg −1 K −1 and the products have the parameters A = 14.8105 × 10 11 Pa, B = 6.379 × 10 10 Pa, R 1 = 6.2, R 2 = 2.2, Γ = 0.5, C V = 524.9 Jkg −1 K −1 [35,36,17]. The detonation energy is given by Q = 3.94 × 10 6 Jkg −1 .…”
Section: Confined Rate Stick Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlling the propagation mechanism of the detonation wave [25][26][27] is another key issue for having a reliable and efficient detonation-based propulsion system. Several propagation modes have been observed in quiescent mixtures in the detonation of a circular tube, such as the spinning, twoheaded, and multi-headed modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%