2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1483688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detonation Meso-Scale Tests for Energetic Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The external methods can be divided into three groups, defined by their measuring parameter: 1) measurement of the free surface velocities of an inert material (normally, a metallic foil); 2) determination of the velocity of the shock wave (SW) in a condensed inert material in contact with the explosive; and 3) direct determination of the induced pressure profile in an inert material. For 1), techniques such as electrostatic measurements of the SW velocity in PMMA barriers [2]; an array of electric pins connected to an oscilloscope [9]; using a streak camera to record argon-filled gaps [10], or the smear camera technique [11]; laser interferometric techniques [2], like Fabry-Perot [12], VISAR [13] and photonic Doppler velocimetry (PDV) [5,14,15] are used. Group 2) comprises methods such as streak cameras that can register images of a SW in water (aquarium test) [16], a moving copper grid in PMMA [9], or they can be connected to optical fibers that are embedded in a PMMA barrier [17]; the short circuit of composite carbon-resistors embedded in a PMMA slab [18]; recording of the pulse voltages, originated by the detonation electric effect [19], with oscilloscopes; and the photoelectric method [20], where an inert liquid emits radiation proportionally to the pressure that it is being applied to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external methods can be divided into three groups, defined by their measuring parameter: 1) measurement of the free surface velocities of an inert material (normally, a metallic foil); 2) determination of the velocity of the shock wave (SW) in a condensed inert material in contact with the explosive; and 3) direct determination of the induced pressure profile in an inert material. For 1), techniques such as electrostatic measurements of the SW velocity in PMMA barriers [2]; an array of electric pins connected to an oscilloscope [9]; using a streak camera to record argon-filled gaps [10], or the smear camera technique [11]; laser interferometric techniques [2], like Fabry-Perot [12], VISAR [13] and photonic Doppler velocimetry (PDV) [5,14,15] are used. Group 2) comprises methods such as streak cameras that can register images of a SW in water (aquarium test) [16], a moving copper grid in PMMA [9], or they can be connected to optical fibers that are embedded in a PMMA barrier [17]; the short circuit of composite carbon-resistors embedded in a PMMA slab [18]; recording of the pulse voltages, originated by the detonation electric effect [19], with oscilloscopes; and the photoelectric method [20], where an inert liquid emits radiation proportionally to the pressure that it is being applied to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This high-resolution optical method has a spatial resolution of 250 μm and a time resolution of 1 ns [9,10,11,12]. These measurements are very useful to determine the performance of new materials during the development of new compositions [1,9]. In this case, small samples, in the order of 1 g, can be tested [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements are very useful to determine the performance of new materials during the development of new compositions [1,9]. In this case, small samples, in the order of 1 g, can be tested [9,10]. However, this technique requires an electronic streak camera which is very expensive [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%