2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60916-4_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterministic Sampling-Based Motion Planning: Optimality, Complexity, and Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach usually samples the environment as a set of nodes or other forms and then maps the environment or randomly searches to find a path. Although the search speed is fast, the search path is usually suboptimal, and finding the path in a narrow channel is difficult [111].…”
Section: B Probabilistic Sampling-based Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach usually samples the environment as a set of nodes or other forms and then maps the environment or randomly searches to find a path. Although the search speed is fast, the search path is usually suboptimal, and finding the path in a narrow channel is difficult [111].…”
Section: B Probabilistic Sampling-based Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Sukharev grids in sampling-based algorithms has already been explored experimentally and theoretically in previous studies. [35][36][37] On the context of RRT*-SV, the Sukharev grid sampling process is also useful in situations where it is not possible to connect q near to a convex vertex of Q vertices . This occurs when it is not possible to connect a collision-free segment from q near to any convex vertices available for addition to the tree.…”
Section: Role Of Sukharev Grids In the Rrt*-sv Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the different stages of the path planning algorithm development, the algorithms can be divided into two categories: fast-exploring random tree method [ 8 ], artificial potential field method [ 9 ], the visible method [ 10 ], A* algorithm [ 11 ] as representative traditional algorithms. Intelligent algorithms represented by genetic algorithm [ 12 ], ant colony algorithm [ 13 ], particle swarm algorithm [ 14 ], immune cloning algorithm [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intelligent algorithms represented by genetic algorithm [ 12 ], ant colony algorithm [ 13 ], particle swarm algorithm [ 14 ], immune cloning algorithm [ 15 ]. In [ 8 ], Janson theoretically proved that the use of deterministic low-dispersion sampling plan usually makes the RRT algorithm display superior performance. In [ 9 ], Yu proposed an improved artificial potential field method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%