2004
DOI: 10.1071/mu04035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the sex of Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) in northern Bass Strait using morphometric measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphometry of yelkouan shearwaters is likely to vary geographically as this species is distributed throughout the Mediterranean basin. Applicability to populations other than the one from which the function was performed must be tested and the performance of a discriminant function for the entire breeding range of this species may be necessary (Van Franeker and Ter Braak 1993;Bertelloti et al 2002;Arnould et al 2004). …”
Section: Sex Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphometry of yelkouan shearwaters is likely to vary geographically as this species is distributed throughout the Mediterranean basin. Applicability to populations other than the one from which the function was performed must be tested and the performance of a discriminant function for the entire breeding range of this species may be necessary (Van Franeker and Ter Braak 1993;Bertelloti et al 2002;Arnould et al 2004). …”
Section: Sex Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All nesting adults were tagged mostly as chicks (or as adults in few cases) using passive transponder tags (Allflex, Capalaba, Australia), which were then implanted subcutaneously between the scapulae. Birds were later sexed by bill measurements (Arnould et al 2004), when first found in the colony as adults in subsequent years.…”
Section: Monitoring and Field Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals were captured in their burrows during daylight hours and weighed in a cloth bag on a spring scale (± 0.05 kg), sexed by bill depth (Arnould et al 2004) and their breeding status recorded. Identification of individuals was achieved through passive induction transponders (PIT tag, 11 × 1.5 mm, Trovan) injected subcutaneously posterior to the scapula at first capture.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both instruments had a cross-sectional surface area < 5% of the total body cross-sectional surface area of the individuals and, hence, would have had a minimal impact on foraging behaviour (Wilson et al 1986). Individuals were captured in their burrows during daylight hours and weighed in a cloth bag on a spring scale (± 0.05 kg), sexed by bill depth (Arnould et al 2004) and their breeding status recorded. Identification of individuals was achieved through passive induction transponders (PIT tag, 11 × 1.5 mm, Trovan) injected subcutaneously posterior to the scapula at first capture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%