2014 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility 2014
DOI: 10.1109/emceurope.2014.6930914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the lowest usable frequency of a frequency-stirred reverberation chamber using modal density

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computed standard deviation of E-field components is compared with the IEC standard defined limit to determine the LUF of the RRA RC. 11 The comparison of the simulated and measured results of field uniformity results show good agreement. The rest of the manuscript is arranged as follows: Section 2 discusses the limitations of the LUF calculations using modal density approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The computed standard deviation of E-field components is compared with the IEC standard defined limit to determine the LUF of the RRA RC. 11 The comparison of the simulated and measured results of field uniformity results show good agreement. The rest of the manuscript is arranged as follows: Section 2 discusses the limitations of the LUF calculations using modal density approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…2,4,5,8 The EMI/EMC testing of a DUT or performing any other kind of testing in RC such as antenna radiation efficiency measurements 9,10 demands the accurate determination of the LUF of the chamber. 1,2,4 The LUF of the chamber can be computed using modal density formulas 3,11 or through the field uniformity analysis of RC internal generated EM fields. The former approach is based on the theoretical cavity modal density calculations, and it is used for the rough approximation of the LUF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be pointed out that to the CST simulation and measurements, we show the power density at the center frequency, which is 5.5GHz. Because the first resonant frequency of the enclosure is 700MHz and as a rule of thumb, the lowest usable frequency of an enclosure is three times the first resonant frequency [14]. Therefore at 5.5GHz we assume a diffuse field has been established.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be pointed out that the field in the vicinity of the point source can not be considered diffuse, so in the final results they should be discarded. When the energy density is obtained, the power density in the enclosure is (14) The FreeFEM++ simulation finished in only a few seconds on a desktop computer ( Intel Core i7-870 @ 2.93GHz, 8GB RAM).…”
Section: The Energy Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that the f LU F IEC did not accurately predict the over-moded condition of RC as the statistical field uniformity and isotropy of the RC is not exactly achieved at f LU F IEC , but rather at little higher than the f LU F IEC due to the associated losses and inherent uncertainties of RC. These losses affect the statistics of the EM field and overmoded condition in RC [40], [53], [54]. Table 6 summarizes the reviewed techniques for the rapid indirect characterization of an RC.…”
Section: A Statistical Tests For Rc Field Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%