2002
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.40.12.4544-4546.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Genetic Structure of the Natural Population of Staphylococcus aureus : a Comparison of Multilocus Sequence Typing with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Analysis, and Phage Typing

Abstract: We used a sample of Staphylococcus aureus strains that are carried by humans and that are representative of the natural population of S. aureus strains in order to assess the value of multilocus sequence typing (MLST), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, and phage typing as epidemiological tools. Only MLST was able to define clonal complexes unambiguously. All DNA-based typing approaches achieved a high degree of agreement, implying phylogenetic concordance, but predi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
74
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(4 reference statements)
9
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore we feel that the intra-species tree we present here would not be greatly improved by the addition of yet more data. The broad consistency of this phylogeny with the basic groupings previously inferred from MLST genes (Feil et al, 2003), sas genes (Robinson et al, 2005), adhesin genes (Kuhn et al, 2006), AFLP clustering (Melles et al, 2004), PFGE (Grundmann et al, 2002) and microarray analysis (Lindsay et al, 2006) provides additional support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore we feel that the intra-species tree we present here would not be greatly improved by the addition of yet more data. The broad consistency of this phylogeny with the basic groupings previously inferred from MLST genes (Feil et al, 2003), sas genes (Robinson et al, 2005), adhesin genes (Kuhn et al, 2006), AFLP clustering (Melles et al, 2004), PFGE (Grundmann et al, 2002) and microarray analysis (Lindsay et al, 2006) provides additional support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The current MLST scheme for S. aureus has proved extremely successful in understanding the population structure of this species and for assigning isolates to particular lineages. In a highly clonal organism, almost any gene will typically provide the same basic lineage assignments -in the case of S. aureus this is clear from the broad consistency of different genes as well as pan-genome techniques such as PFGE (Grundmann et al, 2002) and microarrary analysis (Lindsay et al, 2006). However, individual genes may vary in their utility to reconstruct the relationships between these lineages, and we find no evidence to suggest that MLST genes can be considered the most reliable in this regard.…”
Section: Gene Function Diversity and Informative Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only a few pandemic MRSA clones, the so-called Iberian, Brazilian, Hungarian, New York/Japan, paediatric, and epidemic MRSA (EMRSA)-15 and -16 clones, named after the geographical area where they were first identified or according to epidemiological characteristics. The strains of these successful lineages are responsible for most hospitalacquired MRSA infections all over the world today (Enright et al, 2002;Robinson & Enright, 2003). In this regard, the Barnim EMRSA strain (ST22-MRSA-IV) in Germany is ancestral to the UK EMRSA-15 strain (Murchan et al, 2003;Witte et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, MLST is an adequate technique for generating genetic profiles of a large number of isolates, especially when comparing large international strain collections. 6 For ovine isolates of S. aureus, the RFLP and RAPD techniques used in this report were not suitable as replacements for PFGE but could be useful in combination with PFGE to define strain differentiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%