2013
DOI: 10.2528/pierm13010204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Effective Electromagnetic Parameters of Bianisotropic Metamaterials With Periodic Structures

Abstract: Abstract-A straightforward approach is proposed to retrieve the effective electromagnetic parameters of a slab of bianisotropic material from the scattering parameters. We first obtain the values of the impedance and refractive index of a slab of metamaterial, followed by the deduction of the expressions for determining these electromagnetic parameters including permittivity, permeability and magnetoelectric coupling coefficient. Then, comparisons between the results coming respectively from retrieval techniqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Durach et al taxonomy [32,33] provide a framework for future advances not only in the field of bianisotropic metamaterials, but also for hyperbolic metamaterials, already known for applications in optical imaging, hyperlensing, and emission rate and directivity control utilizing the diverging optical density of high-k states [22,24,39,40]. Researchers in bianisotropics are attempting to use the optical responses of specific bianisotropic metamaterial and metasurface structures including reflection, transmission, and scattering characteristics, resonances, surface electromagnetic waves (SEWs), and various properties of field distributions to retrieve the information about the effective material parameters [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] and the constituent meta-atoms [55][56][57][58]. Another important direction is to homogenize metamaterials composed of specific meta-atoms into an effective medium [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] or inversely to use structure synthesis or modular approach of materiatronics…”
Section: E Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durach et al taxonomy [32,33] provide a framework for future advances not only in the field of bianisotropic metamaterials, but also for hyperbolic metamaterials, already known for applications in optical imaging, hyperlensing, and emission rate and directivity control utilizing the diverging optical density of high-k states [22,24,39,40]. Researchers in bianisotropics are attempting to use the optical responses of specific bianisotropic metamaterial and metasurface structures including reflection, transmission, and scattering characteristics, resonances, surface electromagnetic waves (SEWs), and various properties of field distributions to retrieve the information about the effective material parameters [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] and the constituent meta-atoms [55][56][57][58]. Another important direction is to homogenize metamaterials composed of specific meta-atoms into an effective medium [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] or inversely to use structure synthesis or modular approach of materiatronics…”
Section: E Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several techniques have been reported to extract material parameters of the unit cell [29][30][31][32][33]. The parameters (ε and μ) of the proposed m-ELC are computed using Nicolson−Ross−Weir (NRW) method.…”
Section: Modified Electric−inductive−capacitive (M-elc) Resonatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), the specimens can have complicated shapes (although they are often considered to be spherical or cylindrical [3,6]) and are too small (e.g., films so thin that the matter therein appears to be divided) to be examined by the previously-mentioned techniques [3,6,14,20]. It is thus increasingly recognized that discrepancies between the assumed and actual: size, shape and composition of the specimen (divided versus homogeneous, such as in colloids and metamaterials [4,5,18]) have to be taken into account in connection with the meaning that is attached to the permittivity determined from the response of the specimens to quasistatic or dynamic (wave-like) electric fields (the latter response incorporates diffraction and/or collective effects, not ordinarily accounted-for in methods relying on reflective or refractive response fields). A second trend of permittivity retrieval inverse problems is the recognition of the necessity of taking into account the uncertainty (of the experimental results [20]) of certain parameters (and their sensitivity [5]) that enter into the retrieval model, and of the mathematical ingredients of the retrieval model itself [15], in order to evaluate the accuracy of the retrieved parameters, e.g., [7,9,10,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%