2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00240-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sperm morphology was recommended to be one of the most essential qualitative characteristics of poultry semen (36). It could be used as an essential parameter for predicting the fertilizing ability of spermatozoa (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sperm morphology was recommended to be one of the most essential qualitative characteristics of poultry semen (36). It could be used as an essential parameter for predicting the fertilizing ability of spermatozoa (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An understanding of the significance of specific types of sperm abnormalities and the numbers in which these are detected in the ejaculate allows the diagnostician to make a prognosis of fertility and might indicate a course of treatment to assist in the recovery of a male with abnormal sperm production (Freneau et al 2010). It should be noted that there is currently a substantial amount of support for the recommendation that the minimum percentage of morphologically normal sperm in an ejaculate should lie in the range of 70-80% in order to achieve optimum fertility (Kuster et al 2004). The current findings are consistent to the normal range of sperm morphology accepted for other species, since that 80% normal sperm were verified in the use of all the staining techniques in collared peccaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphology of spermatozoa is an important for a successful fertilization and early embryonic development in assisted reproductive techniques (Kuster et al, 2004). Final Tygerberg Classification Criteria described by Kruger in 1986 and the WHO classification are the most important spermatozoa morphological classifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%