2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining independent control of dual-frother systems – Gas holdup, bubble size and water overflow rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the presence of reagent allows for higher values to be attained compared to the water system. This is in agreement with previous studies (Zhang et al, 2012;Maldonado et al, 2013), in which the mechanisms of frother action on bubble rise velocity, size and gas holdup are investigated in detail.…”
Section: Calibration Of Modelsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, the presence of reagent allows for higher values to be attained compared to the water system. This is in agreement with previous studies (Zhang et al, 2012;Maldonado et al, 2013), in which the mechanisms of frother action on bubble rise velocity, size and gas holdup are investigated in detail.…”
Section: Calibration Of Modelsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Tese are the tiny particles of graphite. Figure 2 shows an example of fotation cell, as reported by Kuan [50]. In mechanical fotation cells, froth is produced by agitation with a rotating impeller.…”
Section: Flotation By Mechanicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two potential problems with this type of approach [ 6 ]. Firstly, control of flotation conditions is reduced when using one reagent with dual functions [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Secondly, amines are expensive reagents, and it may be financially lucrative to replace them with cheaper frothers [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%