2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2015.0518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining demagnetisation risk for two PM wind power generators with different PM material and identical stators

Abstract: Ways to utilise ferrite permanent magnets (PMs), in a better way has been in focus the last couple of years since the use of neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) PMs has been debated. While ferrite PMs offer a low-cost alternative to rareearth PMs, it is a trade-off for lower energy density. Depending on the type of PM and if the PMs are surface mounted or buried, the risk of demagnetisation during a fault condition can vary significantly between machines. In this study, the demagnetisation risk of two electrically si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The demagnetisation parameter C B min PM gives a minimum value of magnetic flux density along the magnetisation allowed in the PM as fraction B r . Considering demagnetisation is important since the different topologies can be expected to provide different levels of protection against demagnetisation [21]. The figure of merit used in comparison is torque per unit machine length and pole pair, with a fixed electrical loading of the stator and a fixed amount of magnetic energy in the rotor.…”
Section: Scope and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The demagnetisation parameter C B min PM gives a minimum value of magnetic flux density along the magnetisation allowed in the PM as fraction B r . Considering demagnetisation is important since the different topologies can be expected to provide different levels of protection against demagnetisation [21]. The figure of merit used in comparison is torque per unit machine length and pole pair, with a fixed electrical loading of the stator and a fixed amount of magnetic energy in the rotor.…”
Section: Scope and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A spoke-type rotor with ferrites is compared to a rotor with surface mounted Nd-Fe-B magnets for a wind power generator in [19,20]. A comparison of demagnetization risk for the same generator types is presented in [21].The aim of this paper is to study how the magnetic properties of PM materials affect the machine design in low-speed radial flux PM generators. To our knowledge, there has not been any previous study combining material properties with rotor design and rotor topology choice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A simulation model studying partial demagnetizing of permanent magnet has been developed and experimentally verified [52]. The risk for partial demagnetization for the ferrite 12 kW generator has been investigated and compared to the risk for the NdFeB generator, showing that both generators have a reliable design if operated as intended [53].…”
Section: Research On Generators For Vawtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be able to determine these is therefore a necessary part of PM machine design [1]- [4]. This is usually done by either transient finite element (FE) simulation coupled with a circuit model, as in [5], or some combination of static FE calculation for parameter estimation and a parametric transient model. In [6] it is discussed how the theory commonly used for short circuit calculations in wound rotors can be adapted for use with PM machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%