2004
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1703_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Causes and Severity of End-User Frustration

Abstract: Although computers are beneficial to individuals and society, frequently users encounter frustrating experiences when using computers. This study represents an attempt to measure, in 111 participants, the frequency, the cause, and the level of severity of frustrating experiences. The data show that frustrating experiences happen on a frequent basis. The applications in which the frustrating experiences happened most frequently were Web browsing, e-mail, and word processing. The most-cited causes of frustrating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
198
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
12
198
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the participants were made to believe the phones were either of the same brand (same-brand condition) or from two different producers (different-brand condition). Further, in order be better able to evaluate the validity of the emotional assessment, it was decided to operationalize an emotionally intense and potentially frustrating user experience by deliberately obstructing the interaction with the first device (Ceaparu, Lazar, Bessiere, Robinson, & Shneiderman, 2004). The core assumption concerning affective transfer was that, based on the failure experience with the first phone, users in the same-brand condition will evaluate the transfer device more negatively (i.e., transfer more of the negative connotations) than users who believe to have received a phone of a different brand.…”
Section: Phase 2: the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the participants were made to believe the phones were either of the same brand (same-brand condition) or from two different producers (different-brand condition). Further, in order be better able to evaluate the validity of the emotional assessment, it was decided to operationalize an emotionally intense and potentially frustrating user experience by deliberately obstructing the interaction with the first device (Ceaparu, Lazar, Bessiere, Robinson, & Shneiderman, 2004). The core assumption concerning affective transfer was that, based on the failure experience with the first phone, users in the same-brand condition will evaluate the transfer device more negatively (i.e., transfer more of the negative connotations) than users who believe to have received a phone of a different brand.…”
Section: Phase 2: the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the integration of these components is to manage the business processes that carry the fast flow of information within organization internally and externally [1,2]. These corporate systems are enlarged with functionality and offer significant benefits to improve the operational efficiency in organization and it also manage the linking with the stakeholders [3,4]. ERP includes software for manufacturing; order tracking, payable and receivable accounts, general ledger, purchase & inventory, warehousing, transportation and human resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complexity is only because of integration of different business applications and also to process huge data. The richer or multifaceted systems can provide less effective functionality if they have huge usability problems [4,5]. Furthermore the functionality and complexity corporate system persuade the confusion, frustration and failure with negative responses toward users, thus which leads mistake while working on such applications [4,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations