2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining and Improving the Localization Accuracy of AprilTag Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, continuous motion compensation throughout the procedure may mitigate this issue. Furthermore, other sources of error possibly contributed to the inaccuracy of the registration process, such as errors introduced by ICP [73,74], tracking [75] or digitizer calibration [76]. For instance, Condino et al reported that the total registration error using OST-HMD in surgical applications is hardly lower than 5 mm [77].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, continuous motion compensation throughout the procedure may mitigate this issue. Furthermore, other sources of error possibly contributed to the inaccuracy of the registration process, such as errors introduced by ICP [73,74], tracking [75] or digitizer calibration [76]. For instance, Condino et al reported that the total registration error using OST-HMD in surgical applications is hardly lower than 5 mm [77].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For image-based pose calculations, visual fiducial markers are essential as a reference system whose lengths, shape, and structure is known. Nowadays, fiducial tags such as ARTags, AprilTags, or ArUcos are used (see Figure 2a), that all have their strengths and weaknesses as investigated, for example, in [62][63][64][65][66]. In this work, AprilTags are used as they perform comparably well in terms of accurate and robust pose detections; see, for example, [67].…”
Section: Visual Fiducial Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbas et al [63], for example, analyzed the position error propagation and identified the angular rotation of the camera about its vertical axis as the primary source of error. Kallwies et al [64] extensively studied the localization accuracy of AprilTags and concluded that AprilTags with a size of 10 × 10 px (i.e., camera pixels) can be detected with certainty. The mean error was 0.25 px and has a maximum of 1.17 px.…”
Section: Visual Fiducial Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to model-based methods, Jin et al (2017), Kallwies et al (2020), andZakiev et al (2020) benchmark and improve fiducial marker systems, e.g., ArUco and AprilTag, influenced by elements such as gaussian noise, lighting, rotation, and occlusion. However, the experimental data is limited to synthetic data or indoor environments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%