2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11044-008-9123-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of wheel–rail contact points with semianalytic methods

Abstract: The multibody simulation of railway vehicle dynamics needs a reliable and efficient method to determine the location of the contact points between wheel and rail that represent the application points of the contact forces and influence their directions and intensities. In this work, two semi-analytic procedures for the detection of the wheel-rail contact points (named the DIST and the DIFF methods) are presented. Both the methods consider the wheel and the rail as two surfaces whose analytic expressions are kn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum difference method [18] is applied to find the difference between the wheel profile contact position and the rail profile contact position. The wheel-rail contact coordinates solutions are checked for indentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum difference method [18] is applied to find the difference between the wheel profile contact position and the rail profile contact position. The wheel-rail contact coordinates solutions are checked for indentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General architecture of the HIL system. especially developed by the authors for this kind of application is used [20][21][22]. The mechanical and electrical characteristics of the vehicle [11,12] and of the roller-rig [14,15] are directly provided by Trenitalia and RFI.…”
Section: Modelling Of the Firenze-osmannoro Hil Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, all the contact points P c l=r of each wheel-roller pair are detected. Some innovative procedures have been recently developed by the authors [20][21][22]; the new algorithms are based on the reduction of the algebraic contact problem dimension through exact analytical techniques [23]. Secondly, the normal contact problem is solved through the Hertz theory [29] to evaluate the normal Fig.…”
Section: The Wheel-roller Contact Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three-dimensional multi-body model of the MDM roller rig presented in this paper is more accurate than those described in the previous works [8,10]. It consists of two parts: the scaled roller rig and the scaled vehicle (half vehicle, according to the architecture introduced before).…”
Section: Mdm Roller Rig: Multi-body Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical model reproduces both the hardware (scaled bogie, rollers) and the software (simulated vehicle) parts of the roller rig. The main contribution of the paper is the study of the complete three-dimensional dynamics of the hardware part of the test rig, in particular, the contact between wheels and rollers [6] was modelled by adapting a previously existing algorithm, described in detail in [7,8], initially defined for the wheel/rail contact model: the algorithm was then modified to simulate the contact between two revolute surfaces and to work with variable step solvers (that improve the numerical efficiency and robustness). The software part of the roller rig and the control laws of the roller motors were derived substantially from those described in [4], even if some improvements were necessary: first of all, since the roller rig described in that paper tests a whole vehicle, while the scaled version tests only one bogie, the controller has to include a virtual vehicle, in which one of the bogies is real and the other is simulated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%