1960
DOI: 10.1007/bf02920701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of water deficit in disks cut out from leaf blades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plant water status was estimated by RWC of leaf blades following the methodology described by Čatský (). Fresh weight (FW) was determined immediately after leaf sample collection, turgid weight (TW) was determined after saturating samples with milliQ grade water for 4 h, and dry weight (DW) measured after oven drying samples at 80 °C for 48 h.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant water status was estimated by RWC of leaf blades following the methodology described by Čatský (). Fresh weight (FW) was determined immediately after leaf sample collection, turgid weight (TW) was determined after saturating samples with milliQ grade water for 4 h, and dry weight (DW) measured after oven drying samples at 80 °C for 48 h.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative water content for control leaves was 91.4%. The measure method of relative water content was described by Catsky (1960) [72]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten leaf discs (1 cm diameter) per replicate, collected at 8:00 a.m. from the second fully expanded leaves (from the top), were used for quantifying the relative water content [RWC; Čatský (1960)]. For osmotic potential (Ψ s ) estimations, 10 leaf discs per replicate were also collected, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −25 °C until use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%