1997
DOI: 10.1021/ef960176f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Volatile Hydrocarbons in Coals and Shales Using Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Chromatography

Abstract: Conventional analytical techniques, such as headspace gas chromatography and Soxhlet extraction, can provide compositional information for the gaseous (C 1-5 ) and heavy (C 15+ ) hydrocarbon constituents, respectively. The volatile (C 6-14 ) hydrocarbons, if present, usually go undetected because of volatility fractionation and loss. In this study, supercritical CO 2 was used to extract the C 6 -C 14 volatile hydrocarbons from pulverized coal samples. Capillary column gas chromatography/mass spectrometry was u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential advantages of the analytical SFE using CO 2 (SFE-CO 2 ) are faster and more efficient extraction, the absence of thermal degradation, less contamination, and the possibility of on-line coupling with chromatographic methods. SFE-CO 2 has been used for the extraction of hydrocarbons from oils, sedimentary rocks, sediments, soils, coals, and shales (Monin et al, Kesavan et al, Hopfgartner et al., Greibrokk et al, Eckert-Tilotta et al, Erkey et al., Lee et al, Levy et al, Furton et al, Yang et al., Li et al, and Benner). Because it is nonpolar, supercritical carbon dioxide generally exhibits a poorer solvent power than commonly used liquid solvents such as dichloromethane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential advantages of the analytical SFE using CO 2 (SFE-CO 2 ) are faster and more efficient extraction, the absence of thermal degradation, less contamination, and the possibility of on-line coupling with chromatographic methods. SFE-CO 2 has been used for the extraction of hydrocarbons from oils, sedimentary rocks, sediments, soils, coals, and shales (Monin et al, Kesavan et al, Hopfgartner et al., Greibrokk et al, Eckert-Tilotta et al, Erkey et al., Lee et al, Levy et al, Furton et al, Yang et al., Li et al, and Benner). Because it is nonpolar, supercritical carbon dioxide generally exhibits a poorer solvent power than commonly used liquid solvents such as dichloromethane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coal samples were dynamically extracted with neat supercritical CO 2 (2 h, 120 °C, and 200 atm) using the apparatus shown in Figure and described in detail elsewhere …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22−26 Monin et al 14 extracted n-aliphatic hydrocarbons from diverse shale source rocks (of the Mahakam Delta, Indonesia, the Douala Basin, Cameroon, and the Paris Basin, France) in the range of n-C 10 through n-C 34 with supercritical CO 2 (at 40 °C and 20 MPa). Li et al 15 extracted similar ranges of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons from U.S. shales and coals of the Fruitland and Pottsville Formations (Cretaceous and Pennsylvanian periods, respectively) at 120 °C and 20.3 MPa, but focused on quantifying the recovery of more volatile (C 6 to C 14 ) hydrocarbons, with yields ranging between 0.01 and 0.2 wt % (grams of extracted hydrocarbon per gram of sample). However, both studies normalized their yields to the sample mass, with no report of organic richness, type, thermal maturity, or mineralogy.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%