1996
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(95)00502-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of uranium by flow injection inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the uranium measurement, the typical detection limit is in the vicinity of 0.02 ng/mL 9 and is sometimes as low as 0.3 pg/mL. 10 Determinations of the isotope ratio of uranium in contaminated soil samples using ICP-M S have been reported very recently. [11][12][13] ICP-MS instruments are com mercially available, but the high resolution required for this application m eans that the equipment remains both expensive and complicated to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the uranium measurement, the typical detection limit is in the vicinity of 0.02 ng/mL 9 and is sometimes as low as 0.3 pg/mL. 10 Determinations of the isotope ratio of uranium in contaminated soil samples using ICP-M S have been reported very recently. [11][12][13] ICP-MS instruments are com mercially available, but the high resolution required for this application m eans that the equipment remains both expensive and complicated to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction of uranium from surface or ground water has recently become of interest [1,2,3,4]. It is known to be leached out of rock and to be present in water so its concentration varies in the range of 0.1-10 µg L -1 [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this limit may not protect specifically sensitive populations, such as children and people with predispositions for hypertension or osteoporosis [2,3]. Common analytical techniques involve ICP-MS [4] and radio-metric analyses [5]. However, these methods are neither accessible nor suitable for daily field work and tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%