Determination of upper flammability limits of C H O compounds in air at reference temperature and atmospheric pressure

Mendiburu, Andrés Z.; Carvalho, João Andrade de; Coronado, Christian R.

doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.009

Cited by 12 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 33 publications

(81 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The assumption (i) establishes that the process is adiabatic and at constant pressure, this has already been explained in a previous work [29]. Nevertheless, it is important to point out that in order to obtain a reliable experimental measurement of the FL the heat losses to the vessel and to the exterior must be minimized.…”

Section: Quantification Of the Diluent's Effect At The Flmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…This is due to the appearance of species of incomplete combustion that introduce more unknowns to the problem. This assumption has also been applied in previous works [29,30].…”

Section: Quantification Of the Diluent's Effect At The Flmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…As aforementioned, when the reaction is representing the LFL, then, complete combustion can be assumed and the products include CO 2 , H 2 O, O 2 , N 2 and M d [31,32]. On the other hand, if the reaction is representing the UFL, then, incomplete combustion is expected and the products may include CO 2 , CO, H 2 O, H 2 , N 2 and M d , and, even C (carbon graphite) in some cases [30,29].…”

Section: Co 2 (%)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A more detailed discussion on the assumption of this global reaction can be found in previous works by Mendiburu et al [29,30]. The assumptions presented in Section 2 are also adopted in the following development.…”

Section: Fipmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The equilibrium constant and enthalpies are determined by applying the procedures explained in Section 5, using the value of T FIP for the products and 298.15 K for the reactants. v. The parameters m and n are obtained from Eqs (29). and(30).Then, the parameters a, a v , b v and c v are determined by Eqs.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Method for determination of flammability limits of gaseous compounds diluted with N2 and CO2 in air

Mendiburu

Carvalho

Coronado

2018

Fuel

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present work studies the flammability limits of combustible-diluent-air mixtures at 25°C and 1 atm pressure. The diluent species, considered in this study, were nitrogen and carbon dioxide. A factor called k FL was obtained from mass and energy conservation, this factor relates the flammability limit of a combustible-air mixture to that of a combustible-diluent-air mixture. The factor k FL varies with diluent concentration. Nevertheless, it was shown that an average value of this factor k () FL av can represent, with good accuracy, the variation of the flammability limits with diluent concentration. An empirical method to determine the flammability limits of combustible-diluent-air mixtures was developed. The method approximates k FL av by means of correlations. For the total set of experimental data, it was found that, for dilution with N 2 and CO 2 respectively: (a) at the LFL the Average of the relative errors (AARE) were 4.02% and 7.01%, the squared correlation coefficients (R 2) were 0.9833 and 0.9660; and (b) at the UFL the AAREs were 3.91% and 5.57%, the R 2 were 0.9920 and 0.9792. At the Fuel Inertization Point (FIP) there is an inert concentration above which the mixture is non-flammable. A method was developed to determine the diluent mole fraction in the combustible-inert mixture at the FIP. The AAREs of 0.82% and 1.95% were obtained for dilution with N 2 and CO 2 , respectively.

show abstract

Section: Quantification Of the Diluent's Effect At The Flmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…This is due to the appearance of species of incomplete combustion that introduce more unknowns to the problem. This assumption has also been applied in previous works [29,30].…”

Section: Quantification Of the Diluent's Effect At The Flmentioning

confidence: 96%