1962
DOI: 10.6028/nbs.mono.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of total x-ray beam energy with a calibrated ionization chamber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibra tio n of P2-4 varies to some extent with th e filtration and diam eter of th e incident X -ray b eam . T h ese varia tions h av e b een studied in detail at th e NBS and ar e described in anoth er r eport [4]. They ar e less th an 2 p ercent for all of th e ch an ges in exp erim ental conditions encounter ed in th e intercomparisons describ ed her ein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The calibra tio n of P2-4 varies to some extent with th e filtration and diam eter of th e incident X -ray b eam . T h ese varia tions h av e b een studied in detail at th e NBS and ar e described in anoth er r eport [4]. They ar e less th an 2 p ercent for all of th e ch an ges in exp erim ental conditions encounter ed in th e intercomparisons describ ed her ein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…internal diameter duralumin scattering chamber described by Stewart (1968). A thick walled ionization chamber, which is a replica of that described by Pruitt and Domen (1962), was used to measure the integrated y-ray flux producing the spectra. Photons of less than 32 MeV energy excite states in 12 0 which decay almost exclusively by proton emission to the ground state of HB (Hayward 1963).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pair spectrometer measurements [19] are not absolute, and were normalized to a weighted average of the NBS calorimeter and spectrometer calibrations at 170 M ev. The NBS spectrometer calibrations and the Franldurt calibration have b een corrected for differences in beam diameter and filtration [16] . No such corrections have been applied to the other points, but they are probably quite small compared to the uncertainties in these points.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%