2011
DOI: 10.1186/1743-422x-8-277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the relative economic impact of different molecular-based laboratory algorithms for respiratory viral pathogen detection, including Pandemic (H1N1), using a secure web based platform

Abstract: BackgroundDuring period of crisis, laboratory planners may be faced with a need to make operational and clinical decisions in the face of limited information. To avoid this dilemma, our laboratory utilizes a secure web based platform, Data Integration for Alberta Laboratories (DIAL) to make near real-time decisions.This manuscript utilizes the data collected by DIAL as well as laboratory test cost modeling to identify the relative economic impact of four proposed scenarios of testing for Pandemic H1N1 (2009) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When influenza A (H1N1) emerged, in April 2009, a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for influenza A virus was implemented for all specimens. 18 Bacterial or fungal testing was ordered by the attending physician as clinically indicated. All positive results were recorded.…”
Section: Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When influenza A (H1N1) emerged, in April 2009, a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for influenza A virus was implemented for all specimens. 18 Bacterial or fungal testing was ordered by the attending physician as clinically indicated. All positive results were recorded.…”
Section: Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens that were positive for influenza A were also subtyped for seasonal H3, seasonal H1 and pandemic H1N1 (2009) genes by RT-PCR. A cost effective approach was adopted in June 2009, to only test specimens negative for both influenza A and B by either singleplex or multiplex real time PCR assays using the Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) classic assay, a multiplexed assay which detects multiple respiratory viral pathogens including FLUA, FLUB, PIV, ERV, ADV, 4 types of CRV, RSV, and hMPV [15]. Exceptions to this testing policy include samples submitted from a provincial influenza-like-illness surveillance program (Tarrant Viral Watch) and some samples from patients with severe illness and admission to the intensive care units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some work has been done on the economic impact of influenza RT-PCR testing and publications cite turn-around times as measurable statistics, and although some preliminary work suggests a patient benefit to early diagnosis and antiviral therapy [143,144], the impact of utilizing RT-PCR for influenza A to guide patient care and antibiotic/antiviral utilization has not been completely elucidated [145,146]. During and following future science group the influenza pandemic of 2009, several national organizations released guidelines and recommendations on molecular detection and characterization of the IFVA virus.…”
Section: Practical Issues For Implementation Of Nats In Molecular Diamentioning
confidence: 99%