2006
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/44.4.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Newer Quinolones Levofloxacin and Moxifloxacin in Plasma by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detection

Abstract: A simple, accurate, sensitive, and precise reversed-phase (RP) high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with fluorescence detection allowing the sensitive and specific quantitation of the newer fluoroquinolones levofloxacin and moxifloxacin is described. Moxifloxacin is used as the internal standard for the determination of levofloxacin and vice versa. A single-step liquid-liquid extraction from human plasma is sufficient for both quinolones. The method is linear from 0.1 to 15 microg/mL and 0.2 t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the determination of levofloxacin plasmatic levels, an accurate, precise and sensitive high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with UV detection was developed and validated, based on previously described methods (Almeida et al, 2005;Baietto et al, 2009;Chien et al, 1997Chien et al, , 1998Conte et al, 2006;Djabarouti et al, 2004;Ji et al, 2006;Lee et al, 1997;Liang, Kays, Sowinski, 2002;Lubasch et al, 2000;Nemutlu et al, 2007;Schulte et al, 2006;Siewert, 2006;Wagenlehner et al, 2006;Wong, Juzwin, Flor, 1997;Zhou et al, 2007).…”
Section: Analysis Of Plasma Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the determination of levofloxacin plasmatic levels, an accurate, precise and sensitive high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with UV detection was developed and validated, based on previously described methods (Almeida et al, 2005;Baietto et al, 2009;Chien et al, 1997Chien et al, , 1998Conte et al, 2006;Djabarouti et al, 2004;Ji et al, 2006;Lee et al, 1997;Liang, Kays, Sowinski, 2002;Lubasch et al, 2000;Nemutlu et al, 2007;Schulte et al, 2006;Siewert, 2006;Wagenlehner et al, 2006;Wong, Juzwin, Flor, 1997;Zhou et al, 2007).…”
Section: Analysis Of Plasma Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] While few methods are simple, some of the methods are quite cumbersome and time consuming. These methods have not checked for interference of antituberculosis drugs in their specificity experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of special additives in mobile phase composition, such as buffers associated to ion pair reagents [11,13], can eventually adsorb to the stationary phase and, thus, reduce column efficiency and lifetime. Time-consuming (13-28 min) isocratic or binary gradient elution methods are shown in the literature [6][7][8][10][11][12][13][14][15], which are not desirable for routine analysis. LC-MS/MS is an expensive technique which requires high investment in both equipment purchase and maintenance, and it may not be available in all analytical laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LC-MS/MS is an expensive technique which requires high investment in both equipment purchase and maintenance, and it may not be available in all analytical laboratories. Some methods for the quantification of MXF in plasma have low sensitivity (i.e., lower limit of quantification [LLOQ] ranging from 50-200 ng mL −1 ) [8,9,12,[14][15][16] or require a large amount of sample (0.4-1.2 mL of plasma) [5, 6, 8-11, 14, 17], which is not suitable for pharmacokinetic studies in small animals. In summary, most of these methods are expensive, tedious, time-consuming, and/or require prior separation procedure and sophisticated equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%