2017
DOI: 10.3390/en10122072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea

Abstract: Optimum wind farm site selection is a quite complicated and iterative process, as it depends upon various parameters and so called "site selection criteria". Determining the relative weight of each criterion, which is a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) process, is very critical during this process. The current study deals with the optimum site selection for on-shore wind farm development in the territory of South Korea using a geographic information system (GIS). Seven different site selection criteria, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the evaluation methods of the onshore optimal locations, and according to the specific literature, 70.6% of contributions included a combination of geospatial tools and multicriteria decision methods,-accounting for 24 works in total-. The most commonly used combination was GIS and MCDM methods, or several of them: AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), FAHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process), OWA (Ordered Weighted Average), TOPSIS, WLC (Weighted Liner Composition) [15,17,27,28,30,31,[34][35][36][39][40][41][42]44,45]. The combination of GIS and SMCA (Spatial Multicriteria Analysis), DSS (Decision Support System), SDSS (Spatial Decision Support Systems) and MCE (Multicriteria Evaluation) can be identified in seven contributions [16,18,19,21,29,32,37].…”
Section: Methodologies: Comparison and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the evaluation methods of the onshore optimal locations, and according to the specific literature, 70.6% of contributions included a combination of geospatial tools and multicriteria decision methods,-accounting for 24 works in total-. The most commonly used combination was GIS and MCDM methods, or several of them: AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), FAHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process), OWA (Ordered Weighted Average), TOPSIS, WLC (Weighted Liner Composition) [15,17,27,28,30,31,[34][35][36][39][40][41][42]44,45]. The combination of GIS and SMCA (Spatial Multicriteria Analysis), DSS (Decision Support System), SDSS (Spatial Decision Support Systems) and MCE (Multicriteria Evaluation) can be identified in seven contributions [16,18,19,21,29,32,37].…”
Section: Methodologies: Comparison and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of location optimisation, the authors of [32] proposed an optimisation approach that relies on integrating geographic information systems (GIS) with a fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) for choosing suitable wind farm sites. Impacts of location choices made on wind turbine operations were discussed in [33].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a flexible and powerful tool for both qualitative and quantitative investigation of multi-criteria problems [40]. AHP is characterized based on paired comparisons as it is helpful in breaking down complicated problems with multiple criteria into number of matched comparisons [41].…”
Section: Application Of Ahp In Siting Solid Waste Landfillmentioning
confidence: 99%