2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the maximum effective burning velocity of dust–air mixtures in constant volume combustion

Abstract: The reactivity of a combustible dust cloud is traditionally characterized by the so-called K St value, defined as the maximum rate of pressure rise measured in constant volume explosion vessels, multiplied with the cube root of the vessel volume. The present paper explores the use of an alternative parameter, called the maximum effective burning velocity (u eff,max ), which also is derived from pressure-time histories obtained in constant volume explosion experiments. The proposed parameter describes the react… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, for a given dust sample, the method does not require parameters such as the volatile content, the exact chemical composition, or the particle size distribution. As for the concept of 'maximum effective burning velocity' (Pu, Jarosinski, Johnson, & Kauffman, 1990;Pu, Jia, Wang, & Skjold, 2006), the current approach is less sensitive to the effect of energetic ignition sources and varying turbulent flow conditions in the vessel, compared to the K St value (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Combustion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, for a given dust sample, the method does not require parameters such as the volatile content, the exact chemical composition, or the particle size distribution. As for the concept of 'maximum effective burning velocity' (Pu, Jarosinski, Johnson, & Kauffman, 1990;Pu, Jia, Wang, & Skjold, 2006), the current approach is less sensitive to the effect of energetic ignition sources and varying turbulent flow conditions in the vessel, compared to the K St value (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Combustion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He used niacin amid, Lycopodium, RDX and silicon dust. Pu, Jia, Wang, and Skjold (2007) performed constant volume combustion tests on both dust-air and gas-air mixtures in vessels of different shapes and volumes. They used the concept of maximum effective burning velocity, that is the burning velocity of an idealized flame with the same pressure-time trace of a real dust flame, and found: a near linear correlation, between the burning velocity and the initial turbulence intensity up to 3 m/s, almost independent on shape and volume of test vessel; linear correlations, vessel dependent, between K St values and the turbulence intensity at the time of ignition.…”
Section: Turbulent Burning Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, influencing factors of the overpressure of fuel-air cloud have been widely studied. Some works on the enclosed space have paid attention to the influencing factors of the overpressure production process of gas-liquid twophase, gas-solid two-phase, and gas-liquid-solid three-phase within the vessel in laboratory [2][3][4][5][6][7], such as the location of the detonation initiation point [8,9], energy [10] and ignition way [11], particle size [12] of fuel-air mixtures, and fuel type [13]. Moreover, the related computational model had been established [8,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%