1997
DOI: 10.1134/1.1258618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the magnetic cubic anisotropy field in (111) oriented films by FMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 yields 4πM 1.644 kG  , which is comparable to the bulk value 1.76 kG. [23] The corresponding conventional magnetic anisotropy constants (fields) are   is about an order of magnitude higher than the bulk value of  3.71 Oe [25]. Judged from the two constants K 1 and K 2 , we see that the easy axis for YIG film is in the (111) direction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 yields 4πM 1.644 kG  , which is comparable to the bulk value 1.76 kG. [23] The corresponding conventional magnetic anisotropy constants (fields) are   is about an order of magnitude higher than the bulk value of  3.71 Oe [25]. Judged from the two constants K 1 and K 2 , we see that the easy axis for YIG film is in the (111) direction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this paper, we present a new method to obtain the anisotropy constants of a YIG film with better accuracy by using a broadband FMR spectrometer in which resonant fields are measured not only as a function of the field orientation, as specified by both the polar angle,  , but also over frequencies that range from 0.7 GHz to 8 GHz. Our method has three advantages over those of angle-resolved FMR at fixed frequency [22,23]: 1) the magnetization value can be directly extracted from the frequency-dependent FMR data without resorting to independent magnetometry measurements; 2) the azimuthal angle of the field orientation with respect to the crystal axis is determined as a part of the fitting process, thereby eliminating any error associated with aligning sample; 3) the resonant field change resulting from a shift in the anisotropy constant turns out to be strongly amplified at low frequencies (  2 GHz), by more than 10 times compared to that at 8 GHz. Furthermore, in this region we observe multiple resonances that can further enhance the accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%