1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(98)77950-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Hydrocarbon Core Structure of Fluid Dioleoylphosphocholine (DOPC) Bilayers by X-Ray Diffraction Using Specific Bromination of the Double-Bonds: Effect of Hydration

Abstract: Changes in the structure of the hydrocarbon core (HC) of fluid lipid bilayers can reveal how bilayers respond to the partitioning of peptides and other solutes (Jacobs, R. E., and S. H. White. 1989. Biochemistry. 28:3421-3437). The structure of the HC of dioleoylphosphocholine (DOPC) bilayers can be determined from the transbilayer distribution of the double-bonds (Wiener, M. C., and S. H. White. 1992. Biophys. J. 61:434-447). This distribution, representing the time-averaged projection of the double-bond posi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

23
197
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(103 reference statements)
23
197
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,51 The NR characterisation of DOPC SLB agrees with data reported in literature. 49,[52][53][54] Curves are characterized by a minimum between 0.15 and 0.20 Å -1 related to the thickness of the bilayer, due to interference arising between the reflected waves at the top and the bottom of the SLB. The defects in the SLB can be evaluated from the amount of hydration water in the hydrophobic tails region of the SLB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13,51 The NR characterisation of DOPC SLB agrees with data reported in literature. 49,[52][53][54] Curves are characterized by a minimum between 0.15 and 0.20 Å -1 related to the thickness of the bilayer, due to interference arising between the reflected waves at the top and the bottom of the SLB. The defects in the SLB can be evaluated from the amount of hydration water in the hydrophobic tails region of the SLB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This asymmetry of the profiles can be due to the different distribution of hydration water and the thermal motions that affect the thickness of the head regions at the interfaces. [53][54][55] Moreover, the two lipid leaflets, the inner (L2-3) and the outer (L4-5) experienced different environments, as the inner leaflet was in direct contact with the SiO 2 layer and water confined between the solid surface and the headgroup layer is expected (L1). 41 The pre-formed SLB was then treated with the NPs dispersed in different environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a locally varying lipid composition and, in case of cholesterol, redistribution between cis and trans monolayers by lipid flip-flop (62) can not be ruled out. A further issue is the interdependence of lipid headgroup hydration and curvature: At strong dehydration, water molecules are extracted from the first hydration shell directly associated to the lipid headgroups (63). This dehydration could change their effective molecular shape and thus κ,κ G , and c 0 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample thickness was reduced and the proper corrections applied to eliminate an influence from extinction on data analysis (Bacon and Lowde 1948); (Worcester et al, unpublished). The magnitude of structure factors decreases somewhat with increasing hydration due to increases in bilayer disorder (Hristova 1998;Wiener and White 1991a). …”
Section: Neutron Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 are the Gaussian profiles reconstructed with the parameters found from the fit. The number of waters per lipid corresponding to the four humidity conditions, as reported in Table 1, were determined previously (Hristova 1998;White et al 1987). The uncertainty associated with water layer thickness was calculated based on the standard deviations of the experimental structure factors, using a Monte-Carlo sampling procedure as described by Wiener and White (Wiener and White 1992).…”
Section: Neutron Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%