2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the glucocorticoids prednisone, prednisolone, dexamethasone, and cortisol in human serum using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous comparison of the positive and negative ionization modes for corticosteroids indicated that negative ionization produced better signal-tonoise ratio and a reduced number of fragments. This is in agreement with other published literature [16,30]. Collisioninduced dissociation with nitrogen gas produced fragments that MPA and MPAG.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Previous comparison of the positive and negative ionization modes for corticosteroids indicated that negative ionization produced better signal-tonoise ratio and a reduced number of fragments. This is in agreement with other published literature [16,30]. Collisioninduced dissociation with nitrogen gas produced fragments that MPA and MPAG.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In a comparison using neat solution, it was observed that negative ionization produced less fragmentation than positive ionization for both prednisolone and d4-cortisol (Figs. 2 and 3), which was in agreement with previous reports [18][19][20]. However, positive ion mode produced a much better signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) than negative ion mode when both were optimized for the glucocorticoids.…”
Section: Ms/ms Detectionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Huang et al used LC-UV to detect the down-field matrix peaks that caused ion suppression for the analyte of interest and modified the chromatographic condition [113]. Another approach for assessing consistent matrix effect among the individual matrix lots is to measure the consistency for the results obtained from sample from individual matrix lot (typically n > 6) [114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123]. One could argue that as long as the results (both back-calculated concentration and MS response) are consistent among the tested lots, matrix effects would not likely contribute negatively to the quantitation.…”
Section: Matrix Effects and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%