The Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) confers transcriptional repression through histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3). Here, we examined how PRC2 is modulated by histone modifications associated with transcriptionally active chromatin. We provide the molecular basis of histone H3 N terminus recognition by the PRC2 Nurf55-Su(z)12 submodule. Binding of H3 is lost if lysine 4 in H3 is trimethylated. We find that H3K4me3 inhibits PRC2 activity in an allosteric fashion assisted by the Su(z)12 C terminus. In addition to H3K4me3, PRC2 is inhibited by H3K36me2/3 (i.e., both H3K36me2 and H3K36me3). Direct PRC2 inhibition by H3K4me3 and H3K36me2/3 active marks is conserved in humans, mouse, and fly, rendering transcriptionally active chromatin refractory to PRC2 H3K27 trimethylation. While inhibition is present in plant PRC2, it can be modulated through exchange of the Su(z)12 subunit. Inhibition by active chromatin marks, coupled to stimulation by transcriptionally repressive H3K27me3, enables PRC2 to autonomously template repressive H3K27me3 without overwriting active chromatin domains.

Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) consists of three core subunits, EZH2, EED and SUZ12, and plays pivotal roles in transcriptional regulation. The catalytic subunit EZH2 methylates histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27), and its activity is further enhanced by the binding of EED to trimethylated H3K27 (H3K27me3). Small-molecule inhibitors that compete with the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) have been reported. Here we report the discovery of EED226, a potent and selective PRC2 inhibitor that directly binds to the H3K27me3 binding pocket of EED. EED226 induces a conformational change upon binding EED, leading to loss of PRC2 activity. EED226 shows similar activity to SAM-competitive inhibitors in blocking H3K27 methylation of PRC2 target genes and inducing regression of human lymphoma xenograft tumors. Interestingly, EED226 also effectively inhibits PRC2 containing a mutant EZH2 protein resistant to SAM-competitive inhibitors. Together, we show that EED226 inhibits PRC2 activity via an allosteric mechanism and offers an opportunity for treatment of PRC2-dependent cancers.

We describe here experiments designed to characterize the secondary structure of amyloid fibrils of the Alzheimer's amyloid plaque peptide A␤, using hydrogen-deuterium exchange measurements evaluated by mass spectrometry. The results show that Ϸ50% of the amide protons of the polypeptide backbone of A␤(1-40) resist exchange in aqueous, neutral pH buffer even after more than 1,000 h of incubation at room temperature. We attribute this extensive, strong protection to H-bonding by residues in core regions of ␤-sheet structure within the fibril. The backbone amide hydrogens exchange at variable rates, suggesting different degrees of protection within the fibril. These data suggest that it is unlikely that the entire A␤ sequence is involved in H-bonded secondary structure within the amyloid fibril. Future studies using the methods described here should reveal further details of A␤ fibril structure and assembly. These methods also should be amenable to studies of other amyloid fibrils and protein aggregates.

The term "wrong-way-round ionization" has been used in studies of electrospray ionization to describe the observation of protonated or deprotonated ions when sampling strongly basic or acidic solutions (respectively) where such ions are not expected to exist in appreciable concentrations in solution. Study of the dependence of ionization of the weak base caffeine on the electrospray capillary potential reveals three distinct contributors to wrong-way-round ionization. At near-neutral pH in solutions of low ionic strength, protonation of caffeine results from the surface enrichment of electrolytically produced protons in the surface layer of the droplets from which ions are desorbed. For solutions made strongly basic with ammonia, gas-phase proton transfer from ammonium ions can create protonated caffeine. These two mechanisms have been discussed previously elsewhere. For solutions of high ionic strength at neutral or high pH, the data suggest that discharge-induced ionization is responsible for the production of protonated caffeine. This mechanism probably accounts for some of the wrong-way-round ionization reported elsewhere.