2009
DOI: 10.1021/ac900308v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Fluorescence Quantum Yield of Quantum Dots: Suitable Procedures and Achievable Uncertainties

Abstract: Despite the increasing use of semiconductor nanocrystals (quantum dots, QDs) with unique size-controlled optical and chemical properties in (bio)analytical detection, biosensing and fluorescence imaging and the obvious relevance of reliable values of fluorescence quantum yields for these applications, evaluated procedures for the determination of the fluorescence quantum yields (Φf) of these materials are still missing. This limits the value of literature data of QDs in comparison to common organic dyes and ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
490
2
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 574 publications
(505 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(187 reference statements)
5
490
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative PL quantum yields (QYs) were measured following literature procedures, using either Rhodamine 590 or Rhodamine 640 dye as standard. 85 Absorption and PL emission spectra were measured as replicates of three or more and the average QYs were recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative PL quantum yields (QYs) were measured following literature procedures, using either Rhodamine 590 or Rhodamine 640 dye as standard. 85 Absorption and PL emission spectra were measured as replicates of three or more and the average QYs were recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum yields were determined according to literature procedures using Rhodamine 6G and Fluorescein as standards. 33 Each QY was determined from measurements in three NC batches produced under the same conditions and with at least 2 measurements per batch. ATR-FTIR measurements were conducted with a Bruker alpha p instrument.…”
Section: Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works concerning fluorescence decay time dynamics of QDs have provided evidence that both k rad and k nrad are expected to be strongly size-dependent. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] On one side, it is known that k rad decreases with the QD size. This fact arises from the relation between the radiative rate, k rad , and the emission frequency peak (determined by QD size) established by the Fermi's "golden rule" of pure exciton states, but also affected by the participation of the so-called "dark exciton states".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%