The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the effective dose delivered by image guided radiotherapy in head & neck and breast treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the differences between the calculated values and the measured values (in the solid water and the heterogeneous phantom) were 0.5–2% in soft tissues, 2–5% in lung, and 2–12% in bone. These data are compatible with other studies (see Table for a comparison with reference). The maximal values were taken as the uncertainties in the effective dose calculation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, the differences between the calculated values and the measured values (in the solid water and the heterogeneous phantom) were 0.5–2% in soft tissues, 2–5% in lung, and 2–12% in bone. These data are compatible with other studies (see Table for a comparison with reference). The maximal values were taken as the uncertainties in the effective dose calculation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The uncertainties are higher compared to previous results obtained for CBCT imaging doses (uncertainty of about 5%) . This is mainly due to the uncertainty related to the variability of the number of images (fixed by the protocol in CBCT) acquired during a treatment fraction as well as the multiples choices of the imaging isocenter (always fixed at the tumor center in CBCT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations