2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the diagnostic value of the Modified Mallampati Score, Upper Lip Bite Test and Facial Angle in predicting difficult intubation: A prospective descriptive study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
20
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported by Iohom et al [17]. Our results differed from some studies that have reported a higher sensitivity [34,35,36], and from those of Hashim et al [27], who evaluated ve airway tests in 60 patients of both genders, and found a 23% sensitivity, 68% speci city, 58% accuracy, and 16% PPV of the Mallampati test, which were smaller in comparison to our study. The wide variations in the reported sensitivities and speci cities of the MMT may be due to the considerable interobserver variability found during this assessment, which related to the performance of the test with or without phonation, patient cooperation, or patient position [16,37].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Similar results were reported by Iohom et al [17]. Our results differed from some studies that have reported a higher sensitivity [34,35,36], and from those of Hashim et al [27], who evaluated ve airway tests in 60 patients of both genders, and found a 23% sensitivity, 68% speci city, 58% accuracy, and 16% PPV of the Mallampati test, which were smaller in comparison to our study. The wide variations in the reported sensitivities and speci cities of the MMT may be due to the considerable interobserver variability found during this assessment, which related to the performance of the test with or without phonation, patient cooperation, or patient position [16,37].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Similar results were reported by Iohom et al [17]. Our results differed from some studies that have reported a higher sensitivity [34,35,36], and from those of Hashim et al [27], who evaluated ve airway tests in 60 patients of both genders, and found a 23% sensitivity, 68% speci city, 58% accuracy, and 16% PPV of the Mallampati test, which were smaller in comparison to our study. The wide variations in the reported sensitivities and speci cities of the MMT may be due to the considerable inter-observer variability found during this assessment, which related to the performance of the test with or without phonation, patient cooperation, or patient position [16,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Airways management is one of the challenging issues in terms of critical patients. A patient would be detoriate or harmed if he/she becomes hypoxic or being inadequately ventilated ( 1 , 5 , 10 - 12 ). BMV is an urgent and necessary method to control the airway and ventilate the patient before the medical staffs prepare a secure one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%