2019
DOI: 10.3390/en12193660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Strength Properties of Energy Plants on the Example of Miscanthus × Giganteus, Rosa Multiflora and Salix Viminalis

Abstract: Energy from biomass accounts for 70% of all renewables used for heat and electricity production. Such a significant share of biomass determines the need for the investigation of their mechanical properties, as most of the lignocellulosic material requires cutting, chipping or milling before its utilization for energy purposes. Therefore, the knowledge about cutting resistance, bending stiffness, and impact strength of the energy plants is very important. The values of these parameters are used in the proper se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The HHV of PAP increased from 17.5 MJ•kg −1 to 19.5 MJ•kg −1 in CSF produced at 300 • C; 40 min. Though these values seem to suffice when they are compared to energetic biomasses (HHV ~18 MJ•kg −1 ) [46], they are still small in comparison with coals 30 MJ•kg −1 [47] or conventional plastics 40 MJ•kg −1 [45].…”
Section: Proximate Analysis and Hhv Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The HHV of PAP increased from 17.5 MJ•kg −1 to 19.5 MJ•kg −1 in CSF produced at 300 • C; 40 min. Though these values seem to suffice when they are compared to energetic biomasses (HHV ~18 MJ•kg −1 ) [46], they are still small in comparison with coals 30 MJ•kg −1 [47] or conventional plastics 40 MJ•kg −1 [45].…”
Section: Proximate Analysis and Hhv Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It follows that the initial fermentation of substrates has a crucial influence on final product properties. In terms of energy content, SS and D were incomparable with typical energy biomass substrates, e.g., Miscanthus x Giganteus, Rosa multiflora (energetic rose), and Salix viminalis (willow) that have an HHV of 17.68, 17.54, and 17.5 MJ•kg −1 , respectively [43].…”
Section: The Impact Of Torrefaction Technological Parameters On the Efficiency Of The Process And Fuel Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, increasing temperature resulted in a decrease in VS and CP from 83% to 75.8% and from 85.6% to 79.7%, respectively (Figure A1g-h). For comparison, the energetic non-woody biomass is characterized by VM of 70-94%, AC of 1.3-17%, and FC of 2.4-17.2% [49,50], while wood biomass has much homogeneous composition, 82-84%, 15.5-16.4, and 0.3-0.8%, respectively [51]. That means the torrefied peat has less VM and more FC than typical wooden biomasses, but it also has much more AC.…”
Section: Csf Production and Proximate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%