2002
DOI: 10.1021/jf0201374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Selenium Concentration of Rice in China and Effect of Fertilization of Selenite and Selenate on Selenium Content of Rice

Abstract: A method of hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry was applied to the determination of the selenium concentration of regular polished rice in China and selenium-enriched polished rice obtained by foliar application of selenium-enriched fertilizer in the forms of selenite and selenate. The average selenium content of regular rice was 0.025 +/- 0.011 microg g(-)(1). On the basis of a daily dietary rice intake of 300-500 g suggested by the China Nutrition Society, the total selenium intake from regul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
122
2
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
14
122
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Se fertilizers have been widely used in some countries, such as Finland to enhance Se concentration in cereals (5,(10)(11)(12). More recently, in order to enhance Se levels in meat and diary products in the UK, commercial Se fertilizers are applied to pasture and forage crops (35).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se fertilizers have been widely used in some countries, such as Finland to enhance Se concentration in cereals (5,(10)(11)(12). More recently, in order to enhance Se levels in meat and diary products in the UK, commercial Se fertilizers are applied to pasture and forage crops (35).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the wide range of application rates employed in cereal crop Se biofortification studies, from <10 to 500 g ha et al 2010, Chilimba et al 2012aGalinha et al 2012;Wang et al 2013); this is also true of herbage sward studies (Whelan 1989;Rimmer et al 1990;Shand et al 1992;Valle et al 2002). It is also widely accepted that crop uptake of selenate (Se VI ) exceeds that of selenite (Se IV ) (Shand et al 1992;Chen et al 2002;Zhao et al 2005;Galinha et al 2012, Ros et al 2016) mainly because selenate is more soluble in soil within the pH range of arable soils (Fleming 1980;Jacobs 1989;Neal 1995) making it more bioavailable (Zayed et al 1998;Li et al 2008;Stroud et al 2010b). Yläranta (1983) observed that application of just 10-20 g ha −1 Na 2 SeO 4 (Se VI ) was sufficient to produce barley grain Se concentrations of 100-200 μg kg −1 , whereas over 100 g ha…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, biofortification of agricultural crops with Se, by means of adding Se along with fertilizers, is a useful technique to increase the consumption of Se by animals and man (Chen et al 2002, Ríos et al 2008, White and Broadley 2009, Broadley et al 2010. Inorganic Se forms differ in terms of absorption and mobility within plants; selenate is more easily transported to shoots, while selenite tends to accumulate in plant roots (Zhang et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%