1986
DOI: 10.1021/ac00297a065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of polar organic solutes in methanol using hot on-column injection capillary gas chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Confirmation. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry confirmation of DMSO and DMS02 in sample extracts was performed on a Kratos MS80 instrument using a hot on-column inlet system (25). Full-scan (500-33 amu) El spectra were acquired at 5000 resolution with a scan rate of 0.6 s/decade.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Confirmation. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry confirmation of DMSO and DMS02 in sample extracts was performed on a Kratos MS80 instrument using a hot on-column inlet system (25). Full-scan (500-33 amu) El spectra were acquired at 5000 resolution with a scan rate of 0.6 s/decade.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This so-called "solvent effect" results from interaction between the tailing water peak and the solutes being chromatographed [2]. The problem has generally been solved by inserting a length of deactivated, uncoated capillary column-a retention gap-between the injection port and the analytical column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem has generally been solved by inserting a length of deactivated, uncoated capillary column-a retention gap-between the injection port and the analytical column. However, Grob and Laubli concluded that water and methanol are poor solvents for use with the retention gap technique [2], and direct aqueous injection into a retention gap connected to a capillary column has rarely been attempted [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%