2012
DOI: 10.1002/elan.201200394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Plant Hormone Indole‐3‐Acetic Acid in Aqueous Solution

Abstract: An electroanalytical method was developed for the determination of the phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid in water using a glassy-carbon electrode. The differential pulse voltammetry was combined with a purification step which involved the extraction of plant tissue and the separation of plant pigments by passing through column Oasis MCX. Indole-3-acetic acid can be determined under optimum conditions with a limit of quantification (LOQ) 2.7 106 mol L1. The linearity range was from 1.8106 to 6.6104 mol L1. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this value is much lower than previously reported (usually over the range of 0.70–0.90 V13bd, 16) and also lower than that on TiC@C‐QANFAs (Supporting Information, Figure S2), indicating the excellent electrocatalytic properties toward oxidation of IAA. The calculated electron stoichiometry was two, affording a cation of 3‐methyleneindolenine carboxylic acid, in agreement with previous reports 13ad. The amperometric response of 0.7 μ M IAA at TiC@C/Pt‐QANFAs microsensor is approximately 5‐fold greater than that at TiC@C‐QANFAs (Figure 2 d).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that this value is much lower than previously reported (usually over the range of 0.70–0.90 V13bd, 16) and also lower than that on TiC@C‐QANFAs (Supporting Information, Figure S2), indicating the excellent electrocatalytic properties toward oxidation of IAA. The calculated electron stoichiometry was two, affording a cation of 3‐methyleneindolenine carboxylic acid, in agreement with previous reports 13ad. The amperometric response of 0.7 μ M IAA at TiC@C/Pt‐QANFAs microsensor is approximately 5‐fold greater than that at TiC@C‐QANFAs (Figure 2 d).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Figure 2 e shows the amperometric responses of the TiC@C/Pt‐QANFAs microsensor to successive additions of IAA. Furthermore, this sensor displays excellent linear amperometric response over the IAA concentration range of interest (Figure 2 f), with a detection limit of 1.0 n M (S/N=3), being at least 20 times better than those reported previously 13ad…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Alternatively, electrochemical methods with the advantages of high sensitivity, low cost, rapid response, and simple apparatus make them suitable alternatives of detection for such compounds. Many electrochemical sensors for the determination of IAA have been used [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Carbon paste electrodes (CPEs) have been applied in various electrochemistry applications because of their advantages over mercuryfree solid electrodes in terms of ease of preparation, speed, stable response, porous surface, renewability, low cost, low ohmic resistance, and no need for the internal solution [17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analytical methods have been developed for the determination of IAA in these matrices, such as differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), 7 high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), 8 liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS), 9,10 and hollow fiber-based liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction combined with high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection (HF-LLLME/HPLC-UV). 11 However, these methods are usually accompanied by time-consuming and material-consuming procedures and also are a cause of environmental pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%