2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.07.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of pesticides in river water using rotating disk sorptive extraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain variables that affect the extraction performance, such as the temperature and agitation velocity, were not investigated in the present study, with the extraction being performed at ambient temperature, even when increasing the temperature results in a higher extraction efficiency due to an increase in the diffusion coefficient, as has been reported. 22 With respect to agitation, a speed of 1500 rpm was chosen because more efficient extraction has been observed with greater agitation. 23 The effect of the sample volume, extraction time and pH were optimized using a Box-Behnken design with a total of 15 experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Certain variables that affect the extraction performance, such as the temperature and agitation velocity, were not investigated in the present study, with the extraction being performed at ambient temperature, even when increasing the temperature results in a higher extraction efficiency due to an increase in the diffusion coefficient, as has been reported. 22 With respect to agitation, a speed of 1500 rpm was chosen because more efficient extraction has been observed with greater agitation. 23 The effect of the sample volume, extraction time and pH were optimized using a Box-Behnken design with a total of 15 experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 It is possible that the response could increase beyond the selected parameters and an extraction time higher than 180 min could become an optimum condition. In addition, the relationship between the sample volume and extraction time can also be seen in the Pareto chart in Figure 1 as another important factor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our laboratory we have recently developed the technology of rotating disk sorptive extraction (RDSE), an alternative microextraction technique similar to SPME and SBSE 13 . The rotating disk extractor has the advantage of providing a greater volume of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) than in SPME, while also having a larger PDMS surface area than that provided by the device used in SBSE [13][14][15][16][17][18] . On the other hand, the disk can be rotated at high velocity without risk of damaging the PDMS phase, because it is only in contact with the solution, which facilitates more efficient analyte mass transfer and faster extraction 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the device used in SBSE, the friction of the phase with the bottom of the vessel containing the sample decreases its durability 13 . Also the RDSE can reduce solvent usage in sample preparation steps and the disk configuration is very easy to make in the laboratory [13][14][15][16][17][18] . The aim of this study was to develop a method for PAHs determination from aqueous matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%