2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.108378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid in water by polydopamine molecularly imprinted /Gold nanoparticles sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as shown in figure 11(C), there was a linear relationship between the peak potential of the reduction peak of DES and the scan rate, E pc (V) = −0.73336ν (V s −1 ) − 0.3369 (R 2 = 0.9911). Depended on the Laviron theory [39], The electron transfer coefficient can be calculated by the Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation: i p = nFQv/4RT, F is the Faraday constant (96485.3383 C mol −1 ), n represents the number of electron transfers, R is the molar gas constant (8.314 J mol 1 • K 1 ), Q is the peak area of the reduction peak calculated in terms of charge, v is the scan rate (V s −1 ), and T is the thermodynamic temperature (298 K). Based on the above equation, n was determined to be 2.…”
Section: Selection Of Buffer Solution Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…as shown in figure 11(C), there was a linear relationship between the peak potential of the reduction peak of DES and the scan rate, E pc (V) = −0.73336ν (V s −1 ) − 0.3369 (R 2 = 0.9911). Depended on the Laviron theory [39], The electron transfer coefficient can be calculated by the Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation: i p = nFQv/4RT, F is the Faraday constant (96485.3383 C mol −1 ), n represents the number of electron transfers, R is the molar gas constant (8.314 J mol 1 • K 1 ), Q is the peak area of the reduction peak calculated in terms of charge, v is the scan rate (V s −1 ), and T is the thermodynamic temperature (298 K). Based on the above equation, n was determined to be 2.…”
Section: Selection Of Buffer Solution Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glassy carbon electrodes (GCE) with fold nanoparticles were prepared through the in situ electropolymerization of dopamine using PFOS as template. They were applied to water samples, previously iltered, and presented a LOD of 2.0 µg/L (Gao et al, 2023). Modi ications to electrode surface with a thin coat of gold nanostar (AuNS) enhanced the voltametric response and resulted in the detection of PFOS in 7.5 ppt in tap water (Lu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Electrochemical Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is required to first screen an unknown sample for the presence of small PFAS molecules such as PFBA and PFBS. Gao et al prepared an electrochemical sensor for the detection of PFOS in real water samples [126]. The sensor (PFOS-MIPPDA/AuNPs/GCE) was made from a GCE modified with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and an electropolymerized molecularly imprinted polydopamine (DA) coating with PFOS as the template.…”
Section: Imprinting On Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%