1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(90)90565-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of noise source height, part I: The measurement of equivalent acoustic source height above a reflecting surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately sources close to the ground are expected when working with terrestrial transportation sources. Moreoverin [4,5,6] the 95% confidence interval on the computed equivalent height is greater than 0.2 m. An error of 0.2 monthe source height can result in prediction errors as high as 3dBa tl arge distances. Pallas used classical array signal processing with av ertical array on passenger cars [7,8] to drawam ap of physical sources with the same limitations on accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately sources close to the ground are expected when working with terrestrial transportation sources. Moreoverin [4,5,6] the 95% confidence interval on the computed equivalent height is greater than 0.2 m. An error of 0.2 monthe source height can result in prediction errors as high as 3dBa tl arge distances. Pallas used classical array signal processing with av ertical array on passenger cars [7,8] to drawam ap of physical sources with the same limitations on accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Glegg and Yo on [4,5] proposed at echnique based on av ertical array with 7m icrophones. The frequencydependent equivalent source height of ad istribution of sources is derivedfrom cross-spectrum densities between microphones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methods, one finds methods based on Laser Doppler Vibrometry [13], Source Height Measurement [14], Sound Intensity [15], Nearfield Acoustic Holography [16] and Spatial Transformation of Sound Fields [17]. Although sound intensity measurements give results that are precise enough for many applications, noise reflections and other sources may influence the results due to the directional characteristics of the intensity probe, thus only well-spaced sources may be separated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%