2012
DOI: 10.1785/0220110128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of New Zealand Ocean Bottom Seismometer Orientation via Rayleigh-Wave Polarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
111
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure robust orientation estimates, we employed both the earthquake orientation method of Stachnik et al (2012) (hereafter termed Method 1) and the ambient noise orientation method of Zha et al (2013, hereafter termed Method 2). Fig.…”
Section: Determination Of Lbs Orientationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure robust orientation estimates, we employed both the earthquake orientation method of Stachnik et al (2012) (hereafter termed Method 1) and the ambient noise orientation method of Zha et al (2013, hereafter termed Method 2). Fig.…”
Section: Determination Of Lbs Orientationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the correct sensor orientations, one can use the Rayleigh-wave polarization-angle method (e.g. Stachnik et al, 2012), in which differences between the Rayleighwave polarizations and their theoretical back azimuths are plotted depending on event origin times. Of course, this method cannot be as precise as measurements with the optical gyrocompass.…”
Section: Sensor Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, Hannemann et al 2014), therefore we do not use the data from this station for our analysis. The data are time corrected (Hannemann et al 2014) and the horizontal components are oriented by using P phases and Rayleigh phases (Stachnik et al 2012;Sumy et al 2015) of know teleseismic events.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%