2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1570-0232(03)00392-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of mifepristone levels in wild canid serum using liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to our best knowledge, no analytical method has been described in the literature which simultaneously determines these two analytes, even though several methods exist, which separately determine either rivanol [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] or mifepristone [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Obviously, it is discommodious to determine rivanol and mifepristone separately for each sample under two different HPLC conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to our best knowledge, no analytical method has been described in the literature which simultaneously determines these two analytes, even though several methods exist, which separately determine either rivanol [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] or mifepristone [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Obviously, it is discommodious to determine rivanol and mifepristone separately for each sample under two different HPLC conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various determining methods based on radioimmunoassay (RIA) [6,7], radioreceptorassay (RRA) [8,9] and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [10][11][12] have been used to measure serum mifepristone levels. Due to the cross-reacting metabolites, the direct RIA and RRA methods were not specific for the parent mifepristone and its metabolites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another one reported by Chang-hai et al [11] was a liquid-liquid extraction with UV detection, with LOD 36 ng/ml and LOQ 240 ng/ml. Recent one described by Stith and Hussian [12] was a solid-phase extraction with UV detection, with the assay linear in the range of 10-1000 ng/ml. No LOD and LOQ were reported, and the internal standard RTI-3021-003 was difficult to acquire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retention times for mifepristone, monodemethyl-mifepristone and the IS were 2.20, 1.82 and 3.37 min, respectively. The method had a very short total run time (4.5 min) for simultaneous determination of RU 486 and RU 42633 compared with the reported HPLC methods (Heikinheimo et al, 1986;Heikinheimo, 1989;He et al, 1989;Shi et al, 1993;Stith and Hussain, 2003;Guo et al, 2006Guo et al, , 2007a.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similar solid phase extraction procedures have been reported to extract the analytes from bio-matrices (Stith and Hussain, 2003;Guo et al, 2006Guo et al, , 2007a. The SPE procedure described by Guo et al was tried during our method development.…”
Section: Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%