2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2009.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of local electrostatic forces for EUVL mask chucks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 To measure the flatness of the pin surface, the e-chuck was supported in a vertical configuration to reduce gravitational effects. The chucking surface consists of a 15ϫ 15 square array of pins covering an area approximately 142.5ϫ 142.5 mm 2 .…”
Section: Description Of the Chuckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 To measure the flatness of the pin surface, the e-chuck was supported in a vertical configuration to reduce gravitational effects. The chucking surface consists of a 15ϫ 15 square array of pins covering an area approximately 142.5ϫ 142.5 mm 2 .…”
Section: Description Of the Chuckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 The effect will be even higher in the case of thin wafer chucking 10 which has also been observed experimentally. 11,12 We will use our analytical model and directly correlate the pin-pitch, chucking pressure and pin-size to the mask OPD/IPD on the front-side. The outline of this paper is as follows: After a short introduction to the problem in Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…smaller than a real EUVL mask chuck, but with respect to materials, flatness, pin structured surface, and electrostatic characteristics closely related to a mask chuck prototype previously developed at our institute 3,4 . In particular, the same low thermal expansion materials (LTEM) were used and the same technologies were applied to manufacture a nominally identical pin structure at the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%