2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2005.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of inorganic and total mercury by vapor generation atomic absorption spectrometry using different temperatures of the measurement cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies 28,30 it was observed the CH 3 Hg + signal was negligible at low NaBH 4 concentration but reached a maximum in presence of 0.75% (m/v) NaBH 4 . However, in those works the NaBH 4 had to be sufficient to transform the entire CH 3 Hg + to Hg 0 in order to be detected by AAS.…”
Section: Hg Org Preconcentrationmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies 28,30 it was observed the CH 3 Hg + signal was negligible at low NaBH 4 concentration but reached a maximum in presence of 0.75% (m/v) NaBH 4 . However, in those works the NaBH 4 had to be sufficient to transform the entire CH 3 Hg + to Hg 0 in order to be detected by AAS.…”
Section: Hg Org Preconcentrationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The solid fraction (about 30 mg) was tansferred to a 50 mL polyethylene flask to which 10 mL of 6.0 mol L -1 HCl were added. The mixture was gently shaken and then heated in microwave oven for 3 min at 60 W. 28,29 After reaching the room temperature, the volume of the mixture was completed to 50 mL with water and then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min. Hg org and Hg inorg were measured in the supernatant.…”
Section: Mercury Speciation In Urban Landfill Leachatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed method based on CVAAS at 184.9 nm was also more sensitive than other methods reported in the literature for the determination of mercury in fish, in which measurements were made at 253.7 nm. [20][21][22] The necessary equipment for developing the measurements at 184.9 nm presented in this paper was cheaper and simpler than that commercially available for mercury determination by CVAAS at 253.7 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Almost all of the published methods regarding CVAAS for mercury have utilized the spin-forbidden resonance line at 253.7 nm. [3][4][5][6][7] Based on the oscillator strength corresponding to the 184.9 nm mercury line (about 50-times greater than that of the 253.7 nm mercury line), an increase in sensitivity at 184.9 nm of at least an order of magnitude, compared to the 253.7 nm absorption line, would be predicted. It was demonstrated by Robinson et al 8 that the sensitivity of mercury determination at 184.9 nm line was higher than at 253.7 nm, but varied greatly with different types of radiation sources used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] It has been reported that UV irradiation can be used to reduce some heavy metal ions to their metal or lower oxidation state intermediates in many samples, but most often with TiO2 or ZnO as a catalyst. [19][20][21][22][23] On the other hand, some metals in their organic states can also be converted to the inorganic state in aqueous solution with or without oxidation reagent, i.e., Hg 2+ , with UV irradiation, and then such metals can be determined by liquid chromatography and/or atomic spectrometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%