1966
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1966.21.1.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of human body volume from height and weight.

Abstract: relatively restricted range of body parameters (27). A tion and comparison with results of almost igoo physical measmore general relationship, applicable to humans urenents taken from the literature indicate that this approach throughout growth and development from birth to provides results acceptable for most clinical purposes, and is maturity, would provide a more satisfactory and conmuch more convenient and rapid than other, conventional voe methods of arriving at indices of body composition (volume, venien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the influence the subject has on the system is no longer detectable above the noise floor. Thus, the range for the 500 V source is around 3.5 m. This performance decreases as the source voltage decreases though While not shown here, tests with other subjects of different heights and weights (and thus, surface area and volume [26]) revealed that the magnitude of the response is also affected by the size and shape of the occupant. For example, a female subject, Person B, approximately 1.65 m (5.42 ft) and 52 kg (115 lbs) traversing the left-to-right path generated a very similar response to that of Fig.…”
Section: A Single-source Systemmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This indicates that the influence the subject has on the system is no longer detectable above the noise floor. Thus, the range for the 500 V source is around 3.5 m. This performance decreases as the source voltage decreases though While not shown here, tests with other subjects of different heights and weights (and thus, surface area and volume [26]) revealed that the magnitude of the response is also affected by the size and shape of the occupant. For example, a female subject, Person B, approximately 1.65 m (5.42 ft) and 52 kg (115 lbs) traversing the left-to-right path generated a very similar response to that of Fig.…”
Section: A Single-source Systemmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…From these equations they also developed a graphical method for the determination of hum an body volume, which was used in the present study. Comparison of this with other methods indicates that this method provides results acceptable for most clinical purposes [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The heart of Chrysomallon is estimated at 4 % of the body volume; by contrast the heart of a healthy human is averages at around 1.3 % of the body volume (mean total heart volume of adult humans 778 ml, taken from [38]; mean human body volume 61.05 L, average of both genders [39]). We interpret the heart, and particularly the muscular ventricle, functions to create suction that draws blood through the gill and thus pump haeomocoel to the rest of the circulatory system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%