2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-005-0089-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Fracture Toughness of Anisotropic Rocks by Boundary Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many investigations were typically focused in opening mode failure for crack growth (Alfano et al, 2009;Erdogan & Sih, 1963;Fowell et al, 1995;Lim et al, 1994;Yoshihara & Kawamura, 2006;Zhang, 2002;Zhou et al, 2012). The cracks in brittle materials are often vulnerable to compressive loading rather than tensile loading (Ke et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations were typically focused in opening mode failure for crack growth (Alfano et al, 2009;Erdogan & Sih, 1963;Fowell et al, 1995;Lim et al, 1994;Yoshihara & Kawamura, 2006;Zhang, 2002;Zhou et al, 2012). The cracks in brittle materials are often vulnerable to compressive loading rather than tensile loading (Ke et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations have typically focused in the opening mode of crack extension . However, cracks in brittle materials are often subjected to compressive loading rather than tensile loading . Many applications of such materials show mixed mode I/II and/or pure mode II fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] However, cracks in brittle materials are often subjected to compressive loading rather than tensile loading. 9 Many applications of such materials show mixed mode I/II and/ or pure mode II fracture. Engineering designers are interested in crack growth in such materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Brazilian tests on CSTBD specimens with a diameter of 7.4 cm, a thickness of 1 cm, and a crack length of 2.2 cm are conducted to observe the actual propagation paths and are compared with the numerical predictions. Details of the experimental procedure can be found in the paper by Ke et al [49]. The five elastic constants of anisotropic marble are E = 78.302 GPa, cracked specimens, the paths of crack propagation for AM-4, CM-4, DM-4, and EM-4 are shown in Figures 17, 19 of crack propagation paths between experimental observations and numerical predictions in AM4, CM-4, DM-4, and EM-4, respectively.…”
Section: Example 2 (Anisotropic Cracked Brazilian Disc Specimens Undementioning
confidence: 99%