1993
DOI: 10.17741/bgsf/65.1.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of ferrous iron in rock and mineral samples by three volumetric methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saikkonen and Rautiainen have reported results for these samples earlier. 23 The published data for RS 31 and RS 71 were obtained by three volumetric methods: Amonette & Scott's method, Wilson's method and Pratt's method. When the results obtained in this work (Table 6) are compared with those reported by Saikkonen and Rautiainen, only titrimetry with Pratt's method for RS 31 gave statistically the same results as were obtained by polarography (values for t-test: tcalc = 1.05, tcrit = 2.18, 95% confidence level).…”
Section: Determination Of Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ In Peat And Other Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Saikkonen and Rautiainen have reported results for these samples earlier. 23 The published data for RS 31 and RS 71 were obtained by three volumetric methods: Amonette & Scott's method, Wilson's method and Pratt's method. When the results obtained in this work (Table 6) are compared with those reported by Saikkonen and Rautiainen, only titrimetry with Pratt's method for RS 31 gave statistically the same results as were obtained by polarography (values for t-test: tcalc = 1.05, tcrit = 2.18, 95% confidence level).…”
Section: Determination Of Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ In Peat And Other Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sulfur contents of RS 31 and RS 71 samples are 0.01% and 0.10%, respectively. 23 These levels are quite low and should not cause much error in polarographic determinations, since the sample decomposition was done in a nitrogen purged vessel. Therefore, the easilysoluble reduced sulfur compounds will volatilize as H2S, and should not cause problems.…”
Section: Determination Of Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ In Peat And Other Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used FeCl 3 -K 2 Cr 2 O 7 and TiCl 3 -K 2 Cr 2 O 7 volumetric methods were applied to M Fe and T Fe measurement, respectively [26]. Milling (with a fineness of 90% passing 0.074 mm), followed by magnetic separation of the reduced samples, was carried out subsequently for the beneficiation of manganese and iron.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for most rocks, there is a high ratio of Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ , as verified by abundant empirical data (Marakushev, ; Middlemost, ) and consistent with the FMQ oxygen fugacity buffer (Eugster, ; Fudali, ). While total Fe can be readily analyzed spectroscopically by techniques including atomic absorption, X‐ray fluorescence, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Jenner & Arevalo, ; Potts, ), determining the proportion of Fe 2+ requires wet chemical oxidative volumetric or complexiometric titrations (Potts, ; Saikkonen & Rautiainen, ; Wilson, ). Most igneous rocks and many other crustal rocks (Zen, ) sit near FMQ or at slightly more oxidized conditions, which are toward the hematite‐magnetite oxygen buffer (Carmichael & Nicholls, ; Clark, ; Fudali, ) while mantle rocks, particularly in the garnet peridotite stability field, tend to be marginally lower than FMQ (McCammon & Kopylova, ).…”
Section: Geological Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%