No abstract

Paleomagnetic study of China and its environs has been the center of a major international effort for the last 10 years. In this paper, we critically review all available paleomagnetic poles of Upper Permian to Tertiary age from the main blocks of China with the goal of placing constraints on models of the formation and the subsequent deformation of the region. After selecting “reliable” poles by applying objective criteria, we divide our analysis into first‐order (motions of blocks) and second order (deformation within blocks). For first order analysis, apparent polar wander paths are constructed for the major blocks. We discuss the compatibilities and contradictions between the geological and paleomagnetic records. A sequence of paleogeographic configurations taking into account geological constraints but remaining within paleomagnetic uncertainties is presented. In general, the major blocks were probably in contact throughout the Permian and Triassic, but the Jurassic was the key age during which most of the movement toward China's present configuration took place. Our reconstructions include certain details which are suggested by the paleomagnetic record but whose geological signatures seem to have been hidden by subsequent events. During the Cretaceous, Chinese poles agree with poles from other continents transferred onto Eurasia. At the second order, we observe that for almost each period with sufficient data the paleomagnetic poles are streaked along a small circle centered on the sampling region, indicating that much of China has been affected by small (< 20°) differential rotations. This we interpret as deformation caused in part by the extrusion of the Chinese blocks away from the Indian collision. The complete annotated list of poles is given as an appendix.

Most proposed fold test formulations use significance tests to try pre‐tilting and post‐tilting remanence hypotheses. We suggest that it is better to consider the fold test as a parameter estimation problem. Making the usual assumption that the distribution of remanence vectors was originally roughly parallel, we propose, using a monte carlo simulation technique, to estimate the amount of tectonic tilting at the time of magnetization along with a 95% confidence interval. If, for example, this confidence interval included 100% then one could not rule out pre‐tilting remanence. In the older terminology, the fold test is positive. The k‐ratio test of McElhinny [1964] is often said to be conservative in that if a study passes the k‐ratio test then it certainly passes a more rigorous test. We show with a typical counter‐example that this assertion is incorrect. Observational uncertainty of bedding directions is easily included in this formulation.

No abstract

Climate models predict extensive and severe degradation of permafrost in response to global warming, with a potential for release of large volumes of stored carbon. However, the accuracy of these models is difficult to evaluate because little is known of the history of permafrost and its response to past warm intervals of climate. We report the presence of relict ground ice in subarctic Canada that is greater than 700,000 years old, with the implication that ground ice in this area has survived past interglaciations that were warmer and of longer duration than the present interglaciation.