2014
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2014.12.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of dissimilatory sulfate reduction rates in marine sediment via radioactive 35S tracer

Abstract: The concentration of sulfate in seawater exceeds all other dissolved electron acceptors combined by more than an order of magnitude. This allows dissimilatory sulfate reduction to persist in marine sediment long after the reactive species of more energetically favorable electron acceptors have been depleted. Thus, sulfate reduction dominates anaerobic carbon oxidation in most coastal and estuarine sediments worldwide (Goldhaber and Kaplan 1975;Jørgensen 1977 Jørgensen , 1982Canfield 1993). The relative import… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the number of reads mapped on SAGs do explain some of the diversity differences observed, but genuine differences among lineages remain (P = 0.016). Our generation time estimate is based on empirically determined parameters (Material and Methods); of these, cellular carbon content varies twofold (27) and sediment age by 2% (4), whereas rates of carbon mineralization were modeled from experimental data with a SD of 5% (19,28). Finally, cellular growth yields likely vary by a factor of 2-3, according to pure culture studies and subsurface sediment modeling (3,6,8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the number of reads mapped on SAGs do explain some of the diversity differences observed, but genuine differences among lineages remain (P = 0.016). Our generation time estimate is based on empirically determined parameters (Material and Methods); of these, cellular carbon content varies twofold (27) and sediment age by 2% (4), whereas rates of carbon mineralization were modeled from experimental data with a SD of 5% (19,28). Finally, cellular growth yields likely vary by a factor of 2-3, according to pure culture studies and subsurface sediment modeling (3,6,8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Storage of SR samples without freezing has recently been shown to result in the re-oxidation of 35 S-sulfides (Røy et al, 2014). In this reaction, FeS is converted to ZnS.…”
Section: Sulfate Reduction Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controls (in triplicate) were fixed with zinc acetate (20% w/w) before adding the radiotracer. Samples were stored frozen at −20 • C (Røy et al, 2014) until further processing in the home laboratory. Sulfate reduction rates were determined using the cold chromium distillation procedure according to Kallmeyer et al (2004).…”
Section: Sulfate Reduction Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%