2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of coal gasification kinetics from integral drop tube furnace experiments with steam and CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it was suggested to adjust all the kinetic rates proportionally to the rate of the CO desorption (C (O) → CO) to obtain the most accurate match with experiments. As a result, instead of applying Equation 8, the frequency factor was scaled on the basis of the char conversion experiment of the Illinois coal [58], which is close to that analyzed in the present study of Utah coal, was based on the Van Krevelen diagram (Figure 4). As regards the optimization of the gasification step, the first phase in the optimization process required proper estimation of the frequency factor for surface oxide desorption in the CBK/G model [21].…”
Section: Optimization Procedures Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it was suggested to adjust all the kinetic rates proportionally to the rate of the CO desorption (C (O) → CO) to obtain the most accurate match with experiments. As a result, instead of applying Equation 8, the frequency factor was scaled on the basis of the char conversion experiment of the Illinois coal [58], which is close to that analyzed in the present study of Utah coal, was based on the Van Krevelen diagram (Figure 4). As regards the optimization of the gasification step, the first phase in the optimization process required proper estimation of the frequency factor for surface oxide desorption in the CBK/G model [21].…”
Section: Optimization Procedures Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, instead of applying Equation 8, the frequency factor was scaled on the basis of the char conversion experiment of the Illinois coal [58], which is close to that analyzed in the present study of Utah coal, was based on the Van Krevelen diagram (Figure 4). 8, and with the adjusted frequency factor on the basis of the experimental data [58]. Judging by the results, the modified frequency factor will be further incorporated in the calculations.…”
Section: Optimization Procedures Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The process can be described by various global or intrinsic reaction models such as the apparent rate model, shrinking core model (SCM), random pore model (RPM), Umemoto et al’s model, char burnout kinetics/gasification (CBK/G) model, char conversion kinetics (CCK). These models express the reaction rate as a product of kinetic rate (in a single Arrhenius rate or a Langmuir–Hinshelwood form) and surface area (as a function of carbon conversion). In particular, RPM has been regarded as a suitable model for char gasification, ,, which considers the intraparticle pore development to describe an initial increase in reactive surface area. However, Mahinpey and Gomez suggested that the maximum gasification rate is not a consequence of surface area increase but of separation in pyrolysis and gasification in most fundamental experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetic constant k is described by the well-known Arrhenius' equation given in Eq. 9 [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31];…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%