2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3583441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Clausius–Mossotti factors and surface capacitances for colloidal particles

Abstract: We propose a method to experimentally determine the Clausius–Mossotti factors and surface capacitances of colloidal particles. This two-step method is based on the following: (i) a precise positioning of particles on activated electrodes according to the applied frequency of an electric field and (ii) particles velocities measurements from a pure dielectrophoretic regime to build the Clausius–Mossotti factor. It confirms previous literature methods and measures the surface capacitance values for a wide range o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, we show that the charging of the electrical double layer (EDL) is the interfacial polarization mechanism responsible for particle behaviour. This is in contrast with early publications where conducting particles in electrolytes have often been incorrectly characterized by a finite conductivity and permittivity, ignoring the double-layer polarization at the metal-electrolyte interface [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, we show that the charging of the electrical double layer (EDL) is the interfacial polarization mechanism responsible for particle behaviour. This is in contrast with early publications where conducting particles in electrolytes have often been incorrectly characterized by a finite conductivity and permittivity, ignoring the double-layer polarization at the metal-electrolyte interface [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Other researchers have measured positive DEP of conducting micron and submicron particles at high frequencies [15]. The low frequency DEP behavior is difficult to observe experimentally because of the appearance of AC electroosmotic (ACEO) flow near the electrodes which tends to mask the observations [15,66].…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 is, in fact, an experimental signature produced by a 10 lm-diameter polystyrene sphere (PSS), a model dielectric particle that we use in our studies (e p ¼ 2:5e 0 , and r p < 10 À14 S=m, 45 ). PSS of this size will experience only nDEP 45 and will be deflected away from the electrodes (towards the region of a weaker electric field), resulting in a diminished amplitude (P 2 < P 1 ) on exit from the electrode region.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, since this frequency is generally above 20 kHz, ACEO is not apparent. Conversely, studies on optimization of trapping percentage using a combination of ACEO and DEP have generally been performed in the absence of pressure driven background flow [19][20][21][22][23]. With the advent of pressure driven flow, maximum throughput may be increased but the convection of the particles from the edge of the electrodes -where the field gradient is at a maximum -to their center is expected to result in a drop in the trapping percentage as the hydrodynamic force can more easily dominate the weakened DEP [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%