2012
DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2012.658075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of bridge health index using analytical hierarchy process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition of various bridge elements was assessed by visual inspection. Finally, BHI was developed by summing the score of all bridge elements [4]. In the Fig.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The condition of various bridge elements was assessed by visual inspection. Finally, BHI was developed by summing the score of all bridge elements [4]. In the Fig.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key to successful assessment of a bridge condition is to recognize various damages. Bridge damage is a slow, progressive and continuous process that is influenced by the imposing load, conditions of various bridge components, environmental factors and the properties of materials [4].…”
Section: Bridge Condition Index (Bci)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though AHP offers a measure for checking the consistency of the overall survey result obtained using geometric mean still it does not prove the validity of responses even if the consistency ratio comes out to be lower than the threshold value of 0.1. Consistent responses do not mean that they are valid in practice, because a crazy person can be perfectly consistent about a non-existent reality [12].…”
Section: ) Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more appropriate way of calculating the relative weights of the factors is to use the priority weights to raise the judgments to that power and then multiplying them [12]. Priority weights for the judgments of an individual respondent may be assessed by calculating the respondent's consistency ratio and subtracting it from 1.…”
Section: ) Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%